October 8th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
All strange and terrible events are welcome, But comforts we despise.
William Shakespeare
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ 9 4
♦ A K 9 7 3
♣ A Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3 2
♥ 10 7 6 5
♦ J 6 5 4
♣ 10 9 4 |
♠ K J 9 8 6 5
♥ 2
♦ Q 10
♣ K J 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ A K Q J 8 3
♦ 8 2
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
2♠ |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠3
This is a close call between a diamond and a spade. Had partner opened one club, I would definitely prefer the spade lead. Here a spade lead has the better chance to set the game; the diamond lead is more likely to hold the overtricks. So I would lead a diamond at pairs, a spade at teams.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 6 5 2
♥ Q 7 4
♦ J 9 3
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 23rd, 2012
|
I held ♠ A-Q-8-3-2, ♥ 7-4, ♦ K-J-10, ♣ K-10-7. How should I advance at unfavorable vulnerability after hearing partner open three clubs in second seat and the next hand bid three diamonds? Is doubling unreasonable, or should I simply raise clubs, and if so, to what level? Or should I bid three spades?
Multiple Choice, Lakeland, Fla.
I'd expect a club contract facing seven decent clubs and maybe a queen on the side to make 10 tricks most of the time. But I'd close my eyes and bid three no-trump, expecting to beat three diamonds by no more than a trick. Double here would be penalties, but very risky, while three spades is nonforcing though encouraging.
My hand was ♠ 9-2, ♥ 7-4-3, ♦ K-Q-9-7, ♣ Q-10-6-4. I heard one spade on my left and two spades from my partner (Michaels cue-bid, showing 5-5 in hearts and a minor). My partner said a call of two no-trump was right, but I thought three clubs was better.
Up-or-Down Vote, Ketchikan, Alaska
The answer is more about partnership agreement than right or wrong. I like to play three clubs here as pass or correct, while two no-trump invites game and asks for the minor. So with your hand I'd simply bid three hearts to show weakness. With the same hand and the king of hearts, I'd bid three diamonds, which I play as inviting game in the MAJOR.
I know computers are beginning to dominate chess and backgammon. Why do they lag so far behind at bridge?
Following Hal, Trenton, N.J.
Off the cuff I'd say that the language of bidding is so flexible that you can't become an expert player without human as opposed to robotic qualities. In the play, computers are beginning to learn how to adapt their picture of the deal from additional information they acquire, but there are still too many variables for them to compete at even the level of a decent human player. Give it time, maybe 10-15 years.
|
Where do you stand on the spectrum of light opening bids, pre-empts and overcalls? And has your position changed as you grew older?
Sixties Swinger, Eau Claire, Wis.
I firmly believe that partnership trust is worth more than the IMPs won or lost on any single deal. So in second seat or when vulnerable, I tend to be very sound. I do open shapely minimum hands as often as the next man, but my two-level overcalls are disciplined. I might step out of line in third seat or when pre-empting nonvulnerable, but what is out of line for me might be seen as fuddy-duddy by the younger generation.
Recently you ran a problem where you had 11 points facing a two-no-trump opening bid. Eleven plus 21 comes to 32, which means you could be off two aces. Your partner's bid usually shows a balanced hand. How are you suggesting a slam without at least another jack?
Fear of Heights, Harrisburg, Pa.
When it comes to 11-counts facing a two-no-trump opening, I don't worry about aces too much. In my life and in that of most people, there has been an occasion or two where 32 points combined missed two aces. I saw Meckstroth and Rodwell do it once in the last decade! It won't happen again, I promise. As for you, don't worry about it. Of course, finding a fit means fewer HCP may be necessary; find the fit first, then check on aces later.
|
October 6th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
But Jack, no panic showing, Just watched his beanstalk growing, And twined with tender fingers the tendrils up the pole.
Guy Carryl
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 5 2
♥ K Q 8 4
♦ 5 4
♣ A 9 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 10 7
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ K Q J 10 8 5 4 |
♠ K 9 8 7 4
♥ J 9 6 2
♦ J 9 7
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 6 3
♥ A 5 3
♦ A K 8 3
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
3♣ |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Your partner has shown a powerhouse, but at this moment it is not clear if he has secondary hearts to go with his diamonds. However, you don't have to guess. Simply bid three hearts and your partner will raise with four, give delayed spade support with three, or take some other descriptive action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 7 4
♥ J 9 6 2
♦ J 9 7
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♣ |
Dbl. |
2♣ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 5th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
To throw away the dearest thing he owned As ’twere a careless trifle.
William Shakespeare
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 4 3
♥ K Q J 3
♦ Q 9 6 5 2
♣ A 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ K 10 3
♣ K 8 6 4 |
♠ K Q 10 8 6 5
♥ 9 2
♦ J 8 4
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
♠ A 9 2
♥ A 6 5
♦ A 7
♣ J 9 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
As my problems go, this one is a bit of a gimme. Your choice is to rebid one no-trump or to repeat diamonds. Just for the record, a call of two hearts would be a reverse, forcing partner to give preference at the three-level and showing at least an ace more than you hold. Of the two choices, rebidding one no-trump limits the hand and describes what you have; two diamonds wrongly emphasizes diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ K Q J 3
♦ Q 9 6 5 2
♣ A 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 4th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Nothing puzzles me more than time and space; and yet nothing troubles me less, as I never think about them.
Charles Lamb
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 6 5
♥ A Q
♦ J 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 3
♥ 8 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 5 2
♣ 8 3 |
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ 9 6
♣ K 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 7
♥ J 10
♦ A K Q
♣ A J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♥6
Your partner's jump to three diamonds is invitational, not forcing. (With a game-force, he would start with a cuebid.) So you can expect a 5-4 hand with extras, and in that context your best game is surely four hearts since it is easy to imagine hands where both red suits will have three top losers. So bid four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5
♥ A Q
♦ J 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
1♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
I boast myself the senior, th' others are Youths, that attend in free and friendly care Great-souled Telemachus, and are his peers….
George Chapman
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 8
♥ J 10 6 3
♦ Q J 9
♣ 9 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ K Q 8
♦ A 8 7 5 3
♣ K Q 10 |
♠ J 7 2
♥ 9 2
♦ 10 6 4 2
♣ 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 4 3
♥ A 7 5 4
♦ K
♣ A J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♣* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spade support, 7-9 points
♣K
One no-trump here should guarantee a club stopper while not necessarily guaranteeing heart length. It would be quixotic to introduce a three-card suit here, so what are you left with? The answer is to double one heart. This shows hearts and is for penalty. When the opponents run to two clubs, you may decide to balance with two hearts. Even if East has four hearts, that would not be the end of the world.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 8
♥ J 10 6 3
♦ Q J 9
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♣ |
Dbl. |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 2nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Therefore the sage knows without going about, Understands without seeing.
Lao-Tzu
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8 7 5
♥ 10 8 4
♦ A Q 2
♣ 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 6 2
♥ 9 6 2
♦ 10 9 8 5 3
♣ J 10 |
♠ K J 9 3
♥ Q J 5
♦ J 7
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 4
♥ A K 7 3
♦ K 6 4
♣ A K Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♦10
You are clearly too good to pass here, but equally you can't drive to game — partner could have a Yarborough. A continuation of one no-trump shows 18-20 high cards, so you can bid two no-trump to suggest a good two-no-trump opening bid and let partner decide what to do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4
♥ A K 7 3
♦ K 6 4
♣ A K Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 1st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Sometimes these cogitations still amaze The troubled midnight and the noon’s repose.
T. S. Eliot
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ A J
♦ J 9
♣ Q 10 8 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7
♥ 9 8 6 4 3
♦ K 10 5 4
♣ 4 3 |
♠ 5
♥ K 10 7 5 2
♦ A 8 7 3
♣ K J 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 8 4 2
♥ Q
♦ Q 6 2
♣ A 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
3♣* |
3♠ |
4♥ |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
* Heart raise, 6-9 points
The opponents have surely reached a 4-3 or 5-3 fit, with dummy likely to offer a ruffing value. One line of defense might be to lead trump, but then declarer's diamonds will surely set up. Another approach is to keep leading hearts to try to build trump tricks for your partner. The most passive option is to lead clubs, and I think I'd do that.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 2
♥ K 9 7 5 3
♦ J 4
♣ 9 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♠ |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
2♠ |
All pass |
|
September 30th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Recently my partner opened one heart in third seat and rebid two no-trump over my response of one no-trump, with: ♠ A-Q-9-7, ♣ Q-10-4-3-2, ♠ 3-2, ♥ A-7. I argued that he should bid two spades, or invent a minor-suit. What do you say?
Trapper John, Memphis, Tenn.
You've covered quite a lot of suggestions here but no one has hit on my preferred action (or inaction, you might say). Passing is clearly right here; responder has neither hearts nor spades, and has a weak hand – why with a misfit would you want to raise the level of the auction. Pass and keep your fingers crossed, I say.
Could you please answer a beginner's question: how does the forcing no-trump work to distinguish good and bad raises? And is there a simple cut-off point for raising partner's major-suit openings or overcalls to three – what do you do with a 10-count in general?
Hamburger Helper, White Plains, N.Y.
The simple rule is that a direct raise shows 7-10 with three or possibly four trump. Going through the forcing no-trump suggests 6-10 and two trump, or 4-7 and three trump. The direct raise to three and the indirect raise via the forcing no-trump suggest unbalanced and balanced hands respectively in the range 10-12. With a 10-count and four trump upgrade the hand, with three trump only upgrade when you have a side source of tricks or a singleton.
Can you help me with the definitions of a weak jump and what you describe as a mixed raise. For example if you hold: ♠ 9-2, ♥ A-7-4, ♦ Q-9-7, ♣ 10-8-6-4-3 would you consider this to be a preemptive raise of clubs or would you think it was a mixed raise? And when do you use preemptive raises of your partner's opening bid?
Scrambled Eggs, Galveston, Texas
|
A simple rule is that a mixed raise of a minor asks partner to bid three no-trump with 18-19 balanced, so today's deal is on the cusp; I'd say it qualified as mixed. I use preemptive raises of opening bids in competition when non-vulnerable and mixed raises (6-9 HCP) when vulnerable.
I've recently been encountering some problems with using the blanket rule of 'third hand plays high'. Specifically when dummy has the jack or the queen in a three-card suit working out whether to put in the nine or 10 from a three-card suit headed by a top honor has been giving me fits. Could you give me some guidance here, please?
Saving Grace, Boise, Idaho
I'll try, but circumstances do alter cases. Typically when partner leads a low card and declarer plays low from a dummy that has jack- or queen-third and you have the queen or king accompanied by the nine or 10, the right play is the intermediate card. This looks VERY silly when partner has underled the ace-king against no-trump but how often does that happen? Against suits the same principle applies even more strongly – though it is not always right!
For those of us learning new bidding conventions, it would be helpful if someone had compiled a list showing how often a chance for the convention could be expected to occur. For instance it would be better to learn a convention which might occur once every 50 hands versus one which might occur once every 100 hands. Has anyone compiled such a list?
Rob Roy, Grand Forks, N.D.
The list of 25 conventions in Barbara Seagram's list is a good place to start. Even 25 conventions sounds like a lot for intermediate players. You can explore further here.
|
September 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
On the whole, I'd rather be in Philadelphia.
epitaph of W.C. Fields
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A 10 9 8 5 3
♥ 7 5
♦ 9 7 3
♣ J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ Q 10 6 2
♦ K Q 8 4
♣ 9 7 6 2 |
♠ 4 2
♥ K 8 4 3
♦ 6 5 2
♣ K Q 10 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 7
♥ A J 9
♦ A J 10
♣ A 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4♥* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Texas transfer to spades
♥2
Responding one no-trump suggests approximately these values and is a perfectly reasonable call. It is the action I would take unless facing a third-in-hand opening bid. But your hand looks very defensively oriented to me, so I would give partner a little latitude and take the more discreet route of passing and seeing what happens next.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ Q 10 6 2
♦ K Q 8 4
♣ 9 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
There is no easy answer as to what plan South should have followed here, but his leap to six hearts was precipitous and perhaps an overbid. But how would you play the slam when West leads the spade three and East covers dummy's spade 10 with the jack?
At the table declarer won with the spade ace and drew trump in four rounds. With only one entry to dummy outside the diamond suit (the club ace), it seemed that he would need a 3-3 diamond break to make the contract. Declarer played ace, king and another diamond and shrugged his shoulders when East showed out on the third round. He ruffed in his hand and could do nothing but finesse the club queen. Had the finesse worked, he could have ruffed out the diamonds successfully. However, East produced the club king and cashed the spade king for one down.
Can you see how declarer should have made the contract? When the diamond queen and 10 fall on the first two rounds, dummy’s 9-7 have become equals against West’s J-6. All declarer needs to do is to lead the diamond nine and let it run, discarding his spade loser.
West wins with the jack and returns a club, but declarer can win with the club ace in dummy and throw his two club losers on the diamonds.
(Yes, a club lead would have beaten the slam, but I don’t ever want to play against anyone who could find that!)