March 14th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
'Avoid it,' cried our pilot, 'check The shout, restrain the eager eye!’
Robert Browning
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K 5
♥ A K J 10 7 4
♦ 10 7 5
♣ Q 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 10 4
♥ 9 6
♦ A Q J 6 4
♣ 8 |
♠ 9 8 6 3 2
♥ 8 2
♦ 9 8
♣ J 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ Q 5 3
♦ K 3 2
♣ A K 10 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
2♥ |
3♥ |
4♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
5♣ |
All pass |
♠4
Your partner's call of two spades is nonforcing, though consistent with a decent suit in a moderate hand. However good your hearts might be, you should view your spade support as entirely adequate, while your values are not very good. Pass, and hope your partner can make it, while being prepared to compete in spades if necessary.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 5
♥ A K J 10 7 4
♦ 10 7 5
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
2♣ |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 13th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, February 28th, 2012
A throw of the dice will never abolish chance.
Stephane Mallarme
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3
♥ 8 5 3
♦ Q 9 8 7 3
♣ 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 5
♥ 9 2
♦ J 6
♣ J 10 9 5 3 |
♠ 6
♥ Q 7 6 4
♦ 10 5 4 2
♣ A K Q 6 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 7 2
♥ A K J 10
♦ A K
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2♣ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣* |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Second negative: 0-4 HCP
♣J
Your absence of a legitimate diamond stopper should not prevent you from bidding one no-trump, which is the value call for your hand, suggesting 8-11 HCP. If your partner produces a second suit, you may be in business; until then, stay low.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ Q 7 6 4
♦ 10 5 4 2
♣ A K Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A place for everything, and everything in its place.
Samuel Smiles
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 7 5 2
♥ J 4
♦ A K Q 6 5
♣ K 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 6 4
♥ Q 6 3 2
♦ 9
♣ 10 8 6 |
♠ —
♥ A 10 9 8
♦ J 8 7 3 2
♣ Q 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 9 8 3
♥ K 7 5
♦ 10 4
♣ A J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
2♣** |
3 NT |
All pass |
*12-14
**Majors
♠6
Your partner's double is Lightner – asking for an unusual lead, here typically dummy's first bid suit unless you have a holding in a side-suit that suggests he has a void there. In this case you do not need to look further than a low club for your lead; perhaps partner has a void and a cashing ace.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 4
♥ 10 6
♦ K 9 8 3
♣ J 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
March 11th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
I have a question about opening strategy. Recently we won a recent team-of-four league match, and this hand was pivotal. I was dealt ♠ A-8, ♥ K-J-9-8-3-2, ♦ 9-2, ♣ 8-7-3. I chose to bid two hearts (which got us to an easy game, while our teammates stole the board in spades). What do you advise on opening either vulnerable or not?
Get Up and Go, Lorain, Ohio
I would advocate opening this hand at any vulnerability. I like my weak-two suits nonvulnerable to hold two of the top four cards — this suit qualifies because with the spade ace, my playing strength is as expected. I'd consider it a dead minimum at unfavorable vulnerability, but I'd still do it.
Is there anything to be said for balancing over a strong no-trump with a five-card major, even in a relatively flat hand? Would vulnerability (or your status as a passed hand) affect the odds?
Balancing Act, Worcester, Mass.
It is MUCH safer to balance over a strong no-trump than a weak no-trump. Partner won't take you so seriously and look for gold by inviting game. Equally, if nonvulnerable, you do not run the risk of going for 200. I'm most aggressive when both sides are nonvulnerable, far more cautious when both sides are vulnerable. I would not advocate balancing with a five-carder in a balanced hand, but two-suiters or the like should try to balance. This is especially so as a passed hand, where partner won't expect too much.
Where does the modern expert community stand on the double of four of a major – as an opening or an overcall: penalties, optional or takeout?
Red Flag, Dodge City, Kan.
I think most people treat a double of four hearts as primarily closer to takeout than penalties. In response to that double, with four spades one tends to bid the suit, or with extra shape in a two- or three-suited hand, one strains to act. The position is less clear facing a double of four spades. The double might be described as optional, meaning responder acts if he believes they can make what they bid. A balanced weak hand rates to pass and hope.
|
At rubber bridge I held ♠ A-9, ♥ Q-10-7, ♦ K-J-2, ♣ A-5-4-3-2 and responded two clubs to one spade. Over my partner's two-heart rebid I tried two no-trump, forcing, and now my partner bid three diamonds. What should I have done now?
Lucy Locket, Lakeland, Fla.
Your partner has suggested length (possibly only three cards) in diamonds. In context your side might make slam in a major. I'd start by giving preference to three spades, and if my partner bids three no-trump, I might advance with a four-club bid. I wouldn't be surprised if six hearts was best, though.
I have been "drafted" to teach a course in basic bridge at my senior citizen center, all because I opened my big mouth and mentioned that I used to play duplicate bridge in Manhattan. I was only (and still am) a mediocre player. Could you please recommend a book that would be suitable for my future students?
Student Teacher, Manhattan, N.Y.
"Five Weeks to Winning Bridge" by Sheinwold is a great book to learn from, but the Audrey Grant series of teaching books is far and away the best educational tool. Contact ACBL and they will help with details.
|
March 10th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Today we walk by love; To strive is not enough, Save against greed and ignorance and might.
Bliss Carman
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K 3
♥ K 9
♦ J 6 3
♣ 10 8 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 5 4
♥ 4
♦ 10 5 2
♣ A K 4 3 |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ A J 10 6
♦ K 9 8
♣ J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ J 2
♥ Q 8 7 5 3 2
♦ A Q 7 4
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
All pass |
♣K
The simplest unambiguous way to show a good spade raise is to cue-bid two hearts — a call that cannot be misconstrued since you did not overcall in hearts at your first turn. Maybe a call of two diamonds should be artificial as well, but why put partner under unnecessary pressure?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 3
♥ K 9
♦ J 6 3
♣ 10 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 9th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Since when was genius found respectable?
Elizabeth Barrett Browning
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q J 8 3 2
♣ Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 5
♥ K 9 7 5 4
♦ 10 6
♣ J 9 2 |
♠ 10 7
♥ A 10 2
♦ 7 5 4
♣ K 10 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 8 2
♥ Q J 6
♦ K 9
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*At least invitational with spade support
♦10
Whenever you have a game-forcing hand and no clear direction to head in, your second call rates to be fourth suit forcing. Bid two hearts, planning to convert a two-no-trump call or a bid of three of a minor to three no-trump. But if partner shows extras, you may be in slam territory — and this way you may steer clear of three no-trump when partner has a singleton or void in hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 8 2
♥ Q J 6
♦ K 9
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
New things are made familiar, and familiar things are made new.
Samuel Johnson
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7 3
♥ K 7 5
♦ A Q 6
♣ A K 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ Q J 10 6 3
♦ J 9 5
♣ J 9 |
♠ 6 5
♥ 9 8 4 2
♦ K 8 7
♣ Q 10 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 2
♥ A
♦ 10 4 3 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Bid one heart. There are both tactical and strategic reasons why one responds to opening bids in a minor here. First, despite your limited values, you cannot rule out game for your side if your partner has a strong hand with either clubs or hearts. Second, you respond to make life harder for your opponents to get their act together.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5
♥ 9 8 4 2
♦ K 8 7
♣ Q 10 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 7th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012
Don’t quack like a duck, soar like an eagle.
Ken Blanchard
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ A 9 5
♦ 10 7 3
♣ A K 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ J 10 8 6
♦ A J 6 2
♣ 10 6 3 |
♠ J 7 2
♥ 7 3 2
♦ 9 8 4
♣ Q J 9 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 5 3
♥ K Q 4
♦ K Q 5
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♣* |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Asking for five-card majors
♥J
Diamonds rates to be your side's safest partscore, so it certainly does not look wrong to pass. However, this hand has just enough potential for game to stay in contention. I would correct to two spades, hoping partner might find another bid. The simple raise to three diamonds might also work out fine here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4
♥ J 10 8 6
♦ A J 6 2
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Even when the wished end's denied, Yet while the busy means are plied, They bring their own reward.
Robert Burns
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A Q J 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 6
♥ K Q J 6 5 4
♦ A J 6
♣ 7 |
♠ 8 4
♥ 10 9 8 7
♦ 4 3
♣ Q J 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ 10 7 5 2
♥ A
♦ K Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Dbl. |
3♥ |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥K
Facing a negative double, you might look no further than your four-card spade suit and bid one spade. That would undervalue your assets considerably. You should jump to two spades, which is invitational and not forcing, suggesting a shapely hand with some extras, which you have.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
You see, but you do not observe.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 6 5
♥ A 5
♦ K Q 6 5 3
♣ 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K J 8 6 3
♦ 4
♣ Q 10 5 4 |
♠ K 10 8 3
♥ Q 9 7 2
♦ J 10 8
♣ J 9 |
| South |
♠ A 7 2
♥ 10 4
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ A K 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥6
Declarer's jump to game rates to be based on a long diamond suit and a single or double heart-stop. There is no reason to panic here, looking to lead some other suit than the one you have bid. Hope that partner can produce a high heart and a diamond stopper, and simply lead a low heart. You might tempt me to lead a club if my suit were king-queen fourth, though.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 4
♥ Q 10 8 6 3
♦ 2
♣ K 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal emphasizes that it is not sufficient to reach your best trump fit; sometimes you have to consider whether positional considerations may override playing in the obvious strain.
When the United States took on the Netherlands here, Vincent Ramondt and Anton Maas put up a good smokescreen to get to four spades, but North, David Berkowitz, was unwilling to sell out cheaply. He intelligently competed to five clubs. Larry Cohen made a fine decision when he decided to pass this, protecting the diamond suit from attack.
Ramondt now chose the well-reasoned lead of the spade four, with the idea of putting his partner in for a diamond through. But North held the spade king, which Larry Cohen inserted at trick one. When it held, it gave Cohen pause for thought. Why had West underled his spade ace? There were two plausible reasons — either West was void in hearts, or his diamonds were such that an urgent switch was required.
Since West was marked with no more than three cards in clubs and hearts on the bidding, Cohen continued with dummy’s club queen, then a finesse of the 10 — a safety play to make sure he could prevent East from getting the lead in trump. When the club 10 held, the rest of the trumps were drawn, then the hearts were cashed, for 13 tricks. As you can see, five hearts would have failed on a diamond lead by East, since the defenders take two diamonds and a ruff.