March 4th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 19th, 2012
|
As dealer, not vulnerable, I held ♠ 8-4, ♥ J, ♦ A-K-Q-J-9-7-5-4-2, ♣ 7. How would you open this hand? What would you do if vulnerable?
Ready for Action, Locust Grove, Va.
Thanks for the question. I think I would simply open five diamonds — although three no-trump to show a solid minor is an option. However, a nine-card suit suggests pre-empting to the maximum. Bid first, apologize later, I say.
In a recent Bid With the Aces, partner opened one club and bid spades twice. Your comment is that your partner showed at least 5-5 in the black suits and a good hand. If he started with a 5-5 pattern, why wouldn't he open one spade instead of one club? Is it to conserve bidding space, or to make it easier for his partner to respond with a weak hand?
Best Foot Forward, Pottsville, Pa.
With 5-5 in the black suits, the question is why if ever you would open one spade, not one club, or vice versa. To start with, when opening a hand 5-6 in the black suits, a one-club call is almost mandatory. With five good clubs and five bad spades, you have discretion to go either way. (I can see a lot of sense in bidding one club here.) However, with five decent spades, especially in a good hand, I would open one spade almost all the time.
Say you are in third seat with ♠ 2, ♥ A-J-6-4-3, ♦ Q-9-4-2, ♣ 10-7-3. Your partner opens one spade, and the next hand overcalls one no-trump. What would you do now? Would you bid, pass, or make a negative double?
Scurrying, Wausau, Wis.
Before we start, let's clarify our terms. A double of one no-trump here is NOT negative, but is penalty — you are about a queen shor for that action, though it is far from unreasonable. If you bid a new suit, you are making a nonforcing call, denying the values to be able to double, so a two-heart call, while not risk free, is an entirely reasonable action.
|
The other day an expert gave me advice that I either misunderstood or misheard. What I thought he told me was it is prohibited for a player to double on more than two occasions if his partner had passed after the first two times? This doesn't sound right, but I was told this by someone who considers himself an authority.
Double Doubling, Spokane, Wash.
Free advice is worth what you pay for it. A third double is not only legal, but it makes plenty of sense — if your hand warrants it. The third double tends to be more high cards than takeout. Perhaps what your adviser meant is that such doubles tend not to be pure takeout. I'd expect your partner would have to decide whether to defend or bid, but he should know that his partner is likely to have about four quick tricks for the auction thus far, so he would not require a trump-stack to pass.
Say you are dealt ♠ K-J, ♥ A-9-7-4-3, ♦ 9-6-2, ♣ Q-10-7 and respond one heart to your partner's one-club opening. What should you bid over his rebid of one spade? Surely you cannot rebid two hearts, and your trump support seems too weak for a raise of either black suit, while you can't bid no-trump without a diamond stopper.
All Exits Blocked, Newark, N.J.
There is nothing intrinsically wrong with a call of one no-trump. (Yes, the opponents might even take five diamond tricks but surely won't manage more than that.). In fact, I might select that action at pairs, but at teams it looks clear to bid two clubs, hoping that partner didn't rebid one spade with an absolutely balanced hand, when one no-trump would have been best. So a club contract rates to be safe enough.
|
March 3rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
What of a truth that is bounded by these mountains and is falsehood to the world that lives beyond?
Michel de Montaigne
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 5 3
♥ J 10 7 6 4 3
♦ A K J 10
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6
♥ A 9 8 2
♦ —
♣ Q 10 9 7 6 |
♠ K 10
♥ K 5
♦ Q 6 4 3
♣ J 8 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ Q
♦ 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♣10
It may look attractive to raise to two spades on this auction, but there is a real danger that you may be running into a spade stack. While East has indicated unsuitability for defense, West may still be lurking in the wings. I would pass here, and only bid two spades with the same hand plus an additional minor spade honor. Let partner compete to two spades if he wants to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ Q
♦ 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1♠ |
2♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 2nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
But if success I must never find, Then come misfortune, I bid thee welcome, I’ll meet thee with an undaunted mind.
Robert Burns
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 8 5 2
♥ 7 6
♦ 10 6 3
♣ K Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6
♥ Q 10 4 2
♦ A Q 5 2
♣ 9 8 2 |
♠ 10
♥ K J 8 5 3
♦ 9 8 7
♣ 10 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ J 9 7 4 3
♥ A 9
♦ K J 4
♣ A J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♥2
Some players might try to come to a perfect stop in three spades, but the practical call is to bid four spades at once, hoping to reach a sound game, or persuade the opponents to let it through. Since you have what passes for opening values and a good fit, bid four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 8 5 2
♥ 7 6
♦ 10 6 3
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 1st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The last thing one knows in constructing a work is what to put first.
Blaise Pascal
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 4 3
♥ K 5
♦ Q 10 3
♣ K Q 6 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ A 10 8 4
♦ K J 8 6 2
♣ 8 2 |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ 7 2
♦ A 9 7 5
♣ A 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 9
♥ Q J 9 6 3
♦ 4
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣8
This hand raises the issue of what your partner should expect from a two-level overcall. Any reader who has seen me criticize overcalls on five-card suits may be surprised when I say that an overcall here is perfectly OK — though I draw the line at a jump overcall. Any decent six-card suit tends to be acceptable, though I'd probably pass at unfavorable vulnerability.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ K 5
♦ Q 10 3
♣ K Q 6 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Whate'er he did was done with so much ease, In him alone, ’twas natural to please.
John Dryden
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ 10 7
♦ A 3
♣ A K J 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 7
♥ K 5 2
♦ Q 10 9 4
♣ Q 4 2 |
♠ A K 9 4 3 2
♥ A J 3
♦ 7 2
♣ 9 6 |
| South |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 8 6 4
♦ K J 8 6 5
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| 3♣* |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Hearts and Diamonds
♠Q
You cannot do less than bid three diamonds. Your partner has guaranteed four diamonds and a little more than a dead minimum, so he should hardly find a three-level contract taxing. If he has anything in reserve, he may well be able to make game, and by raising diamonds you make it harder for the opponents to compete to three clubs if your partner has shape but not high cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 8 6 4
♦ K J 8 6 5
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2♣ |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 28th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
And wisdom is a butterfly And not a gloomy bird of prey.
W.B. Yeats
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ Q J 8 7 4
♦ A J 8 6
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ 9 6 5
♦ 4 3 2
♣ K Q J 5 4 3 |
♠ K Q 10 9 5
♥ 3
♦ Q 10 9 7 5
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7 2
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K
♣ A 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣* |
3♣ |
3♠** |
Dbl. |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong
**Hearts
♠8
Although you have a beautiful hand you have no reason to assume that your partner has anything at all — even four hearts — since he might have been forced to act with nothing. Having doubled already to show a good hand, you can raise to three hearts now, to show an even better one and rely on partner to bid game with as little as queen-fifth of hearts and a black king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 7 2
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K
♣ A 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 27th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I only took the regular course … the different branches of Arithmetic — Ambition, Distraction, Uglification and Derision.
Lewis Carroll
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3
♥ 9 7
♦ A J 8 7 5 4 3
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 2
♥ 8
♦ Q 10 6
♣ 9 7 6 5 3 |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ Q J 5 4 3
♦ 9
♣ A Q 10 8 |
| South |
♠ K 10 6 5
♥ A K 10 6 2
♦ K 2
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
2♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣7
Your partner cannot have five spades or he would have acted already. So the choice is to lead your top club (hoping to hit the 'jack'pot), or to play for partner to come through with unexpected length in one of the red suits. Leading through dummy looks like a better chance to me. If so, there may well be a case for leading the heart jack rather than a small card, unorthodox as that might appear.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ J 5 2
♦ Q 9 7 4 2
♣ J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 26th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Say you hold ♠ 8-3-2, ♥ K-J-5, ♦ A-Q-9-7-3, ♣ J-7 and respond one diamond to your partner's one-club opening. When your partner rebids two clubs, would you pass, raise clubs, or show where your values lie by bidding two hearts?
Moving Story, Elkhart, Ind.
The danger with a two-heart call is that it is hard to know how to stay out of game after you make that bid. Your partner will assume you have a slightly better hand than you do (though the action is far from unreasonable). Since passing seems too pessimistic, I'd raise to three clubs and hope partner can explore for three no-trump with a nonminimum. On this action he'd show stoppers, not ask for them.
My partner and I play inverted minors. We have agreed that to raise clubs, responder needs five, but only four to raise diamonds. We handle diamonds this way because the odds of a three-card diamond opening seem to be quite low. Exactly what are the odds of opening with only three diamonds, and do you agree with our scheme of responses?
Fiddling in a Minor Key, San Francisco, Calif.
Yes, I agree with your approach. I believe there's a 95 percent likelihood that a one-diamond opening will show four or more cards. Additionally, since I have a natural and nonforcing response of two no-trump available, I can always make this call with a completely balanced hand with four-card support, trying to get to no-trump whenever each of us has a balanced hand.
At my duplicate club I'm never sure when to ask questions if at all. The two situations that concern me are when I know what my opponents are playing and my partner does not, and when I don't believe that the answer to the question will affect my call.
Grill-Master, Augusta, Ga.
|
You should always feel comfortable in asking questions when intending to bid, even if you think you know what is going on. Also, if your opponents' methods are unusual and you believe they should have been explained, you can clarify for your partner's benefit. (After all, you might be wrong about what the bids mean!) Don't ask till the auction is over if you do not intend to bid, whatever the explanation.
In a recent Aces column, your partner had opened one club and you responded one spade. The next hand overcalled three diamonds and your partner bid four diamonds. You now suggested that with ♠ Q-J-9-8-3, ♥ K-3-2, ♦ 10-6, ♣ K-10-7, you should use Keycard Blackwood. How can you use Keycard if you don't know whether the trump suit should be spades or clubs?
Unsuitable, Miami, Fla.
Four diamonds was a control bid agreeing spades. So spades are trump and four no-trump is Keycard for spades. I don't think your partner could ever set clubs via this four-diamond cuebid (though you yourself could suggest clubs at the six-level).
What are the rules about dummy acting during the hand to prevent an infraction? Are the rules the same for leads from the wrong hand and for revokes? What if nobody spots the infraction at the table?
Rules for Dummies, North Bay, Ontario
Dummy can point out to declarer which hand he is in and whether he won or lost the last trick. And he can check whether his partner has revoked. But he can't ask the opponents if they revoked in midhand. However, when an infraction has occurred and been agreed on, dummy may call the director. And at the end of the deal he can also call the director to establish if an infraction has occurred.
|
February 25th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
When the truth entails tremendous ruin, To speak dishonorably is pardonable.
Sophocles
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ A K J 3
♦ 9 8 3
♣ 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 4
♥ 9 6 4
♦ A Q 4
♣ K 7 6 5 |
♠ 7 2
♥ 10 8 5
♦ K 10 7 6
♣ J 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ Q 7 2
♦ J 5 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣5
With everyone bidding, your partner is probably the player who has stretched to act, but you cannot afford not to invite game here. Cue-bid three diamonds to show a high-card limit raise or better, but don't hang your partner any higher. If he signs off in three hearts, accept his word for it and let him play there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ Q 7 2
♦ J 5 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 24th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
But let us argue points in order, And reason the whole case carefully.
Edgar Lee Masters
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 10 9 6
♥ A 8 7
♦ A 8 6 3 2
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ Q 10 6 3
♦ K J 9 4
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ K J 9 5 4
♦ Q 7
♣ J 9 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 4
♥ 2
♦ 10 5
♣ A Q 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥3
If you are unwilling to pass, should you overcall, double, or bid one no-trump? The last option is unpalatable for more than one reason, and a two-level overcall in your weak diamond suit might have you banned from bridge. What's left is a canape one-spade overcall, or — my choice — a double. I'd be planning to convert a two-club response to two diamonds, pretending I have a little more than I do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9 6
♥ A 8 7
♦ A 8 6 3 2
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In today's deal from the NEC tournament held last year in Yokohama, both tables reached five diamonds, Justin Hackett on a club lead, Valio Kovachev on a spade lead. The key to the defense is that when East gets in with the heart king, he must return a trump to kill the crossruff. The Bulgarian East missed this and played back a spade, but Justin drew a round of trumps himself, prematurely, on winning the spade ace, and that was fatal. In the ending, after declarer had trumped two plain cards in dummy, East could ruff a winning heart high and return a second diamond to leave declarer with a losing spade at trick 13.
In the other room a spade lead forced declarer to rush to take his discards. After he gave up a heart to East, Tom Hanlon accurately played back a trump, but Hugh McGann erred by discarding a spade — he could surely have afforded a club. Now, when declarer ruffed two spades to dummy, he had set up his long spade and at trick 13 would be left with a winner, not a loser. So the declarer who should have succeeded went down, and the one who should have been defeated made his contract.
Most of the expert declarers in five diamonds brought home their game when East did not find the diamond shift. Paul Gosney of Australia was one of the few defenders who found the diamond shift at the critical moment to beat five diamonds by force.