|
When my partner dealt and opened one spade, I could not decide whether to respond, holding ♠ J, ♥ J-10-9-4-3, ♦ Q-8-5-4, ♣ Q-4-2. I know it adds to six points, but with no aces or kings, I just hated the hand and thought we might get out of control if I bid. What logic should I apply to these positions?
Star-Gazer, Elkhart. Ind.
When you hold an unbid major, the motivation for responding (in case you have game in that strain) is stronger. Here, if partner rebid spades or introduced a red suit. you would not be unhappy that you responded one no-trump. Even if partner bids clubs, you may have improved your side's trump suit. And for sure, if your no-trump bid is not forcing, I would act now — if only to stop the opponents from coming in.
Has putting your column on the Internet worked out well for you?
Net Result, Huntington, W. Va.
Just to remind everyone, you can find back issues of the column at bridgeblogging.com, where I've enjoyed talking directly to my readers. And the fact that occasional points of analysis do come to my attention is reassuring, in that it indicates that the rest of the time I'm not too far off the mark. I'd say making the column available has been a nearly unqualified success.
My partner had a problem when I opened three clubs, and he was clutching: ♠ K-10-4, ♥ A-Q-9-4-3, ♦ K-Q-9-3, ♣ K. Does the vulnerability (we were not, they were) affect the decision to bid? For the record, three clubs was our last making contract!
Missed the Boat, Waterbury, Conn.
|
One other issue is relevant: What seat were you in? I'd pass a first-in-hand pre,empt, especially at this vulnerability, because I know my partner might take unusual liberties. Over a second-seat pre-empt I would bid three hearts and hope to get to three no-trump or four hearts. It is the absence of aces that worries me though, and this does argue for restraint.
Where do you recommend getting new or used bridge books from? And are there any new authors I should be keeping an eye out for?
Bibliophile, Wausau, Wis.
It is hard to look beyond Kantar, Kelsey, Lawrence and Reese as the big four. Kantar for humor, Kelsey for technical ideas, Lawrence for completeness, and Reese for style. Frank Stewart is always informative and entertaining too. For new books try Baron Barclay; for used books maybe Amazon is best.
In fourth chair one of our opponents held this hand: ♠ J-10-2, ♥ Q-4, ♦ A-J-10-9-4, ♣ K-9-4. I opened one spade, passed back to him. He responded one no-trump and assured his partner after they had played the no-trump game down 500 that his call was correct. Personally, I thought that his hand was too weak and that two diamonds was a more obvious call. What do you think?
Trouble Town, Augusta, Ga.
The range for a balancing no-trump is quite wide — say 11-15. So this hand qualifies in high cards, but I suspect that with no clear spade stop I might have gone the coward's route and bid two diamonds. Certainly, though, the player's choice was not unreasonable — so long as his partner was on the same wavelength about the balancing no-trump having a wider range than in direct seat.
|
In today's six clubs South shook his head reflectively as dummy came down, thinking that he should have been in the grand slam. A few seconds later he was shaken back into wakefulness when he cashed the club king and realized he had an inevitable trump loser.
After winning the opening lead with his diamond ace, he cashed the heart ace and played a club to the king. The heart king and queen followed, allowing declarer to throw both his losing diamonds away. After the spade ace and king both stood up, South advanced the spade eight.
West did the best he could when he discarded a diamond, and declarer ruffed low in dummy. Now came the club queen, and after nine tricks (three spades, three hearts one diamond and two clubs) a four-card ending had been reached, with the lead in dummy. North had four losing red cards, declarer the A-J-9 of clubs and the spade queen. West had three clubs to the 10 and a diamond.
Now declarer led a heart from dummy and ruffed high. To avoid being endplayed in trumps at the next trick West under-ruffed, a defense that would have been good enough had East held the master spade. (South would have led a spade to East, and West would have scored his club 10.) But when declarer led his spade queen, West could score only one of the last three tricks whatever he did.