February 13th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
And now the matchless deed's achieved, Determined, dared, and done.
Christopher Smart
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 6
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ A 6 5 3 2
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ J 10 9 4
♦ K Q J
♣ K Q J 6 5 |
♠ J 10 8
♥ 5 3
♦ 10 9 8 4
♣ 10 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 7 5 4 3
♥ K 8 7
♦ 7
♣ A 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♥* |
Pass |
7♠ |
All pass |
*Showing the heart king
♣K
On this auction, dummy will put down four spades while declarer will have four hearts. Since both minor suits are extremely unattractive to lead from, I suggest you might as well lead from your five-card suit. Since you have the balance of high cards on defense, it might work out well to lead a deceptive spade two.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 4 2
♥ J 5 4
♦ Q 3
♣ A 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
February 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 29th, 2012
|
Recently I had a ruling against us which I did not understand. My expert professional LHO overcalled one no-trump over my one-spade opening. My partner jumped to four spades, and after a long pause my RHO passed. When it came back to my LHO, he bid five clubs and found it to be a good save. Is this legal?
Hot Under the Collar, Ketchikan, Alaska
After a break in tempo, as here, the way the director should consider if the pause pointed to taking the action selected by the player. If it did, was the selected action an automatic one or was there a logical alternative? If the answer to the first question is yes, then the director would adjust the score unless there was no logical alternative to the successful action. I'm guessing the director determined that a slow pass of four spades did not imply that the sacrifice would be successful.
I held ♠ K-10-9-4, ♥ K-10-5-3, ♦ 10-4-2, ♣ A-Q and was faced with the problem of whether to open in third seat and if so whether to open a major or a minor. What do you advise?
Lost Leader, Pleasanton, Calif.
In any seat but third seat I would open one diamond. In third chair my diamonds look too weak for me toopen one diamond. With a good four-card major I might select that instead –but I do not have one! I'll live with the one-diamond opening and hope my LHO does not overcall one no-trump.
In my bridge club we play the short club or diamond. If my partner bids one club or one diamond, can I pass, or must I bid the next step up?
Moving On, Great Falls, Mont.
I assume what you mean is that playing five-card majors, you can open either minor on a three-card suit, not a two-carder. If so, these opening bids are nonforcing, but you may dredge up a response with a shortage in the suit opened. With a four-count and a five-card major but a singleton in partner's suit, I would indeed respond. I'd tend to pass one diamond more often than one club, since the former call does tend to deliver a real suit most of the time.
|
How would you raise your partner when the auction proceeds around the table one diamond – one spade – two clubs, to you, holding ♠ Q-10-3, ♥ K-10-3, ♦ K-10-5-3, ♣ K-10-4? At the table I thought that a gentle cue-bid of two diamonds would suffice, since both opponents were bidding strongly. But it turned out that we missed a game.
Undercooked, Lorain, Ohio
You have not provided me with the responding hand, but I'd say you did just fine here. As a general rule the higher cue-bid (especially if it takes the auction up a level, as here) shows at least an opening bid. Your choice of the lower cue-bid suggested a sound raise to the two-level, and it is not clear that you have any more than that.
Last week I held one of the strongest hands I ever held. My RHO opened two diamonds and I was looking at ♠ A-K-10-8-7-5-3, ♥ A-K-Q-J-4, ♦ —, ♣ Q. Should I double and then bid spades, ignoring the hearts, should I jump in spades, or is there a better approach? As the cards lie, partner has both minor-suit aces and a spade void, but seven hearts is cold.
Upward Bound, Harrisburg, Pa.
Cue-bidding to show a two-suiter with the majors seems a good way to start. The cue-bid (or even a call of four diamonds, showing the majors and a better hand) to be followed with five spades to show a hand with longer spades than hearts and 11 tricks in your own hand, might let partner bid seven hearts. Incidentally, jumping in spades should be strong, while doubling, then bidding or jumping in spades, is even stronger. But you can't ignore the hearts here.
|
February 11th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It is as well to know the limitations of force; to know where to blend force with maneuver, assault with conciliation.
Leon Trotsky
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 5
♥ A 9
♦ J 10 8 7 5
♣ 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K J 10 7 6 3
♦ 9 4 3 2
♣ A K 7 |
♠ J 10 8 7 4
♥ 4 2
♦ K 6
♣ 10 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 3 2
♥ Q 8 5
♦ A Q
♣ Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
This is a takeout double, suggesting a decent hand, probably with two spades. Since your opponents appear to have a 4-4 heart fit and your LHO must surely be very weak, you should jump to three no-trump, hoping to be able to set up one minor or both for the extra tricks you need.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 6 3 2
♥ Q 8 5
♦ A Q
♣ Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
Pass |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 10th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
To say silly things by chance and weakness is a common misfortune, but to say them intentionally is intolerable.
Blaise Pascal
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 10 9 8 3
♥ A 8
♦ A J 2
♣ A 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 4
♥ 10
♦ 9 5 4 3
♣ K Q 5 3 2 |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K J 7
♦ K Q 10 6
♣ J 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 5
♥ Q 9 6 5 4 3 2
♦ 8 7
♣ 10 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
Pass |
1♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
A convention invented simultaneously by Robert Jordan and Alan Truscott 50 years ago allows responder to show a limit range (after a major suit has been doubled) by jumping to two no-trump. Jump support shows, instead, a pre-emptive raise. It is easy to extend this principle to use it after a minor has been doubled. With a balanced hand you can start by redoubling.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K J 7
♦ K Q 10 6
♣ J 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 9th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
There is no calamity greater than lavish desires. There is no greater guilt than discontentment. And there is no greater disaster than greed.
Lao-tzu
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ Q 8 3 2
♥ A 8 7 6
♦ A 9
♣ A J 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7
♥ K 2
♦ 10 8 7 6 5 4 2
♣ 7 4 |
♠ 10 9 6 4
♥ J 10 5 4
♦ Q 3
♣ 10 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 5
♥ Q 9 3
♦ K J
♣ K Q 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♦6
Facing a balanced 22-24, you have just enough to explore for game. Best is to bid three clubs, using this call as Stayman just as it would be if your partner had opened two no-trump. Equally, if you play transfers over the opening two-no-trump call, you would be able to show a five-card major if you had one.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 6 4
♥ J 10 5 4
♦ Q 3
♣ 10 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2♣ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 8th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The dust of exploded beliefs may make a fine sunset.
Geoffrey Madan
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A 8
♥ K Q 8 2
♦ Q 9
♣ K Q 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J
♥ A 5
♦ A 10 8
♣ J 9 7 6 4 2 |
♠ Q 10 7 5
♥ J 10 9 6
♦ J 7 5 4 2
♣ — |
| South |
♠ 9 6 4 3 2
♥ 7 4 3
♦ K 6 3
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1♣ |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♣ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
All pass |
♣2
This is a close call. Do you repeat a bad six-card suit or pass? Because of the looseness of the club opening in Standard American, I would vote for rebidding clubs, allowing partner to join in if (as will inevitably happen) the opponents compete to the two-level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J
♥ A 5
♦ A 10 8
♣ J 9 7 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♦ |
1♥ |
1♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 7th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
In theory it is easy to convince an ignorant person: in actual life, men not only object to offer themselves to be convinced, but hate the man who has convinced them.
Epictetus
| West |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A J 7
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ Q 10
♣ J 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 2
♥ J 10 6 4
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A K 9 8 |
♠ 10 5 3
♥ A Q 5
♦ A J 6 5 3
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 6 4
♥ 8 2
♦ K 8 2
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1♦ |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♠8
Despite your good support for the minors, it is more practical to rebid two no-trump and limit your hand while getting across your good spade stop. You have not ruled out playing in either minor, but have let your partner know the basic nature of your hand. A raise to three clubs may stymie your partner if he has modest extras but no spade stop.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 7
♥ K 9 7 3
♦ Q 10
♣ J 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 6th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 23th, 2012
The way is all so very plain That we may lose the way.
G.K. Chesterton
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A
♥ A 10 7 2
♦ K Q J 10 6
♣ 9 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 3 2
♥ —
♦ 5 4 3 2
♣ A Q 8 6 4 3 |
♠ K J 9 5
♥ 9 8 6 5 3
♦ 9 7
♣ J 5 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 7 6 4
♥ K Q J 4
♦ A 8
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
3♥ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
With the clubs and hearts appearing to behave decently for declarer, the question is whether to go for the surprise attack in spades or to lead your long suit, even though declarer has announced a stopper. Personally I'd vote for the diamond, but I can certainly see the case for the spade lead.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 3
♥ 10 6
♦ A Q 8 6 3 2
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♣ |
| 2♦ |
2♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
February 5th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
As a neophyte, I am frequently intrigued by the bidding. In a recent article, South opened one no-trump and North responded two hearts with long spades. Then South bid two spades with only two of them! Please explain.
Bidding What You Don't Have, Atlanta, Ga.
Mea culpa. I often forget that I should be explaining Jacoby transfers to my readers. (In my defense, I believe most players are now taught transfers in response to one no-trump, but not all my readers learned recently, and not all of them learn transfers.) Responses in a red suit to one no-trump are intended as a transfer to the suit above, showing five cards in that suit. Continuations are natural and are discussed here.
In fourth chair I opened two diamonds. My LHO doubled, and my RHO, who held ♠ A-J-3, ♥ 10-9-4, ♦ K-3, ♣ Q-10-4-3-2, bid three clubs, claiming that this showed a good hand. I don't understand why it should not be very weak.
Disinformation, Casper, Wyo.
I'm not sure I agree with your RHO. He might have taken a shot at three no-trump himself, hoping to buy a diamond stop or be able to run the clubs. But perhaps he was playing that his call of two no-trump was the Lebensohl convention, acting as a transfer to three clubs. In that case a direct three-club call would indeed be constructive — but not forcing.
If I open one club or one diamond (playing five-card majors, thus opening the so-called better minor), do I have to have an honor in the suit?
Honor-Bound,Bellevue, Wash.
|
Absolutely not; open your longer minor, or one club with three cards in each minor. The closest I get to your rule is that with 4-4 in the minors I tend to open the better suit — but others have different rules to break that tie.
I heard a two-diamond pre-empt to my left and my partner bid two spades. What choices do I have with ♠ J, ♥ Q-10-8-4-3, ♦ K-10-5, ♣ K-J-9-4?
Lost in Spades, Charleston, S.C.
I think the lack of fit suggests bidding two no-trump now. Once in a while you might miss a game, but you make it a lot easier for your partner if he can describe his hand fully at his next turn.
Yesterday at our club West opened the bidding one heart and heard a two no-trump response, alerted as Jacoby. West, with a void in clubs now bid two clubs. The director was called, ruled that the insufficient call was conventional, and that East must now pass any sufficient call made by West. West now bid and made six hearts. Has the law been changed, or was this ruling correct?
No Justice, No Peace, Houston, Texas
Over the Jacoby bid, West clearly had a bidding box accident and so should be allowed to change his bid to three clubs. Had he really intended to bid two clubs, then if the next hand did not condone the call, the TD's ruling would be correct. However, the "insufficient" law has recently been changed. If the insufficient call did not convey additional information, then even if it were conventional, it might be permitted. The laws are not easy to enforce here.
|
February 4th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
When I consider life, 'tis all a cheat, Yet fooled by hope, men favour the deceit….
John Dryden
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 6 2
♥ A Q 10
♦ K 10 8 5
♣ A K 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 4
♥ 9 7 6 3
♦ A J 2
♣ 7 6 5 |
♠ K Q
♥ K 4
♦ 9 7 3
♣ Q J 9 8 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 9 7 5 3
♥ J 8 5 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♦ |
2♣ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Forcing
♣5
In response to a reverse it is relatively common these days to treat a rebid of your long suit (here, two spades) as forcing for one round. Almost all other actions deny five cards in the suit in which you responded. Whether or not you have this special agreement, there is no reason not to bid two spades. If you play the call as nonforcing and partner passes, you won't have missed game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 7 5 3
♥ J 8 5 2
♦ Q 6 4
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today's deal features a problem in both the bidding and the play. After West doubles one spade, North redoubles to show a good hand, South rebids two spades to show a minimum hand with six spades, and North can make a splinter raise to four clubs to show a singleton club and spade support. That lets South show his diamond control, and North follows up with Blackwood for aces, then with five no-trump for specific kings. When South shows the heart king, North takes a shot at the grand slam, taking the reasonable gamble that his side can take enough tricks from club ruffs in his hand, or that declarer can establish diamonds.
The lead of the club king goes to the ace. Next comes a club ruff, the spade king, the diamond ace, and a diamond ruff.
This is followed by the spade queen, a second diamond ruff, and the spade ace, while the heart two is thrown from dummy. A heart to the queen for a further diamond ruff is followed by the heart king, and dummy is high.
The advantage of following this line of play is that declarer gets to discover whether the diamonds are going to break before he has to discard from dummy on the third top spade. Had East discarded on the third diamond, then the play of the last trump from South’s hand would have squeezed West if he had begun with five diamonds and four hearts.