Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 30th, 2012

And now the matchless deed's achieved,
Determined, dared, and done.

Christopher Smart


South North
East-West ♠ K Q 6
 A Q 6 2
 A 6 5 3 2
♣ 7
West East
♠ 2
 J 10 9 4
 K Q J
♣ K Q J 6 5
♠ J 10 8
 5 3
 10 9 8 4
♣ 10 9 8 3
South
♠ A 9 7 5 4 3
 K 8 7
 7
♣ A 4 2
South West North East
1♠ Dbl. Rdbl. Pass
2♠ Pass 4♣ Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 5 NT Pass
6* Pass 7♠ All pass

*Showing the heart king

♣K

Today's deal features a problem in both the bidding and the play. After West doubles one spade, North redoubles to show a good hand, South rebids two spades to show a minimum hand with six spades, and North can make a splinter raise to four clubs to show a singleton club and spade support. That lets South show his diamond control, and North follows up with Blackwood for aces, then with five no-trump for specific kings. When South shows the heart king, North takes a shot at the grand slam, taking the reasonable gamble that his side can take enough tricks from club ruffs in his hand, or that declarer can establish diamonds.

The lead of the club king goes to the ace. Next comes a club ruff, the spade king, the diamond ace, and a diamond ruff.

This is followed by the spade queen, a second diamond ruff, and the spade ace, while the heart two is thrown from dummy. A heart to the queen for a further diamond ruff is followed by the heart king, and dummy is high.

The advantage of following this line of play is that declarer gets to discover whether the diamonds are going to break before he has to discard from dummy on the third top spade. Had East discarded on the third diamond, then the play of the last trump from South’s hand would have squeezed West if he had begun with five diamonds and four hearts.


On this auction, dummy will put down four spades while declarer will have four hearts. Since both minor suits are extremely unattractive to lead from, I suggest you might as well lead from your five-card suit. Since you have the balance of high cards on defense, it might work out well to lead a deceptive spade two.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 9 6 4 2
 J 5 4
 Q 3
♣ A 8 3
South West North East
1 NT
Pass 2♣ Pass 2
Pass 3 NT All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 29th, 2012

Recently I had a ruling against us which I did not understand. My expert professional LHO overcalled one no-trump over my one-spade opening. My partner jumped to four spades, and after a long pause my RHO passed. When it came back to my LHO, he bid five clubs and found it to be a good save. Is this legal?

Hot Under the Collar, Ketchikan, Alaska

After a break in tempo, as here, the way the director should consider if the pause pointed to taking the action selected by the player. If it did, was the selected action an automatic one or was there a logical alternative? If the answer to the first question is yes, then the director would adjust the score unless there was no logical alternative to the successful action. I'm guessing the director determined that a slow pass of four spades did not imply that the sacrifice would be successful.

I held ♠ K-10-9-4,  K-10-5-3,  10-4-2, ♣ A-Q and was faced with the problem of whether to open in third seat and if so whether to open a major or a minor. What do you advise?

Lost Leader, Pleasanton, Calif.

In any seat but third seat I would open one diamond. In third chair my diamonds look too weak for me toopen one diamond. With a good four-card major I might select that instead –but I do not have one! I'll live with the one-diamond opening and hope my LHO does not overcall one no-trump.

In my bridge club we play the short club or diamond. If my partner bids one club or one diamond, can I pass, or must I bid the next step up?

Moving On, Great Falls, Mont.

I assume what you mean is that playing five-card majors, you can open either minor on a three-card suit, not a two-carder. If so, these opening bids are nonforcing, but you may dredge up a response with a shortage in the suit opened. With a four-count and a five-card major but a singleton in partner's suit, I would indeed respond. I'd tend to pass one diamond more often than one club, since the former call does tend to deliver a real suit most of the time.

How would you raise your partner when the auction proceeds around the table one diamond – one spade – two clubs, to you, holding ♠ Q-10-3,  K-10-3,  K-10-5-3, ♣ K-10-4? At the table I thought that a gentle cue-bid of two diamonds would suffice, since both opponents were bidding strongly. But it turned out that we missed a game.

Undercooked, Lorain, Ohio

You have not provided me with the responding hand, but I'd say you did just fine here. As a general rule the higher cue-bid (especially if it takes the auction up a level, as here) shows at least an opening bid. Your choice of the lower cue-bid suggested a sound raise to the two-level, and it is not clear that you have any more than that.

Last week I held one of the strongest hands I ever held. My RHO opened two diamonds and I was looking at ♠ A-K-10-8-7-5-3,  A-K-Q-J-4,  —, ♣ Q. Should I double and then bid spades, ignoring the hearts, should I jump in spades, or is there a better approach? As the cards lie, partner has both minor-suit aces and a spade void, but seven hearts is cold.

Upward Bound, Harrisburg, Pa.

Cue-bidding to show a two-suiter with the majors seems a good way to start. The cue-bid (or even a call of four diamonds, showing the majors and a better hand) to be followed with five spades to show a hand with longer spades than hearts and 11 tricks in your own hand, might let partner bid seven hearts. Incidentally, jumping in spades should be strong, while doubling, then bidding or jumping in spades, is even stronger. But you can't ignore the hearts here.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, January 28th, 2012

It is as well to know the limitations of force; to know where to blend force with maneuver, assault with conciliation.

Leon Trotsky


East North
East-West ♠ K Q 5
 A 9
 J 10 8 7 5
♣ 4 3 2
West East
♠ —
 K J 10 7 6 3
 9 4 3 2
♣ A K 7
♠ J 10 8 7 4
 4 2
 K 6
♣ 10 9 6 5
South
♠ A 9 6 3 2
 Q 8 5
 A Q
♣ Q J 8
South West North East
Pass
1♠ 2 3 Pass
4♠ All pass    

♣K

At the Gold Coast last year the deal shown today came up. Three Souths out of four opened one no-trump and wrapped up at least nine tricks in three no-trump. John Holland, however, was playing a weak no-trump, so the auction went very differently.

Tislevoll led three rounds of clubs. Declarer won in hand and led a low trump to the queen, finding the bad news. Then came a diamond finesse, and when the diamond ace dropped the king, suddenly there was hope. Holland led a low spade to the king and ran the diamonds.

The winning defense for East is to ruff the first diamond with an intermediate trump. (Even a low trump will do, though it is a little harder work.) Declarer can do no better than discard a heart. Back comes a heart, won in dummy, and East ruffs the next diamond to leave declarer with a heart loser.

In fact East pitched a heart on the diamond jack, and also on the next diamond, as did Holland. When the third diamond was led, East ruffed with an intermediate trump, and Holland could see that discarding a heart would fail when East played a club, since he would have to win in hand. Meanwhile, overruffing with the spade ace would fail when he led a heart to dummy since East would score both his trumps.

So he underruffed. Whatever East did next, declarer could win the next trick in dummy and take the rest.


This is a takeout double, suggesting a decent hand, probably with two spades. Since your opponents appear to have a 4-4 heart fit and your LHO must surely be very weak, you should jump to three no-trump, hoping to be able to set up one minor or both for the extra tricks you need.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 9 6 3 2
 Q 8 5
 A Q
♣ Q J 8
South West North East
1 Pass 1
1♠ 2 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, January 27th, 2012

To say silly things by chance and weakness is a common misfortune, but to say them intentionally is intolerable.

Blaise Pascal


East North
East-West ♠ K Q 10 9 8 3
 A 8
 A J 2
♣ A 9
West East
♠ A J 4
 10
 9 5 4 3
♣ K Q 5 3 2
♠ 7 6 2
 K J 7
 K Q 10 6
♣ J 8 7
South
♠ 5
 Q 9 6 5 4 3 2
 8 7
♣ 10 6 4
South West North East
Pass
Pass Pass 1♠ Pass
Pass 2♣ Dbl. Pass
3 Pass 3♠ Pass
4 All pass    

♣K

In today's deal from the Gold Coast tournament the 3-1 heart break suggests that no game can be made against best defense. But who puts up the best defense?

When Michelle Brunner was South, she played in four hearts on a top club lead. She could not afford to duck for fear of the diamond shift, so she won and played the spade king. West won, and now needed to play a trump at once; not unreasonably, he cashed the club queen before playing the trump 10, and Brunner now read the position perfectly.

She won the trump ace, played the spade queen, ruffed a spade, went to the diamond ace, and led another spade. If East discarded, she would pitch her club loser and play a second trump. When East ruffed in, she overruffed, ruffed a club to dummy, and gave up just the one trump trick.

At another table Pablo Lambardi declared game as North. East led a top diamond and was allowed to hold the trick. This is the sort of deal where partnerships playing count signals will (justly) find themselves at a loss. How can West let East know what to do, since he cannot really afford to overtake the diamond king?

As it was, when the diamond king held the trick, West showing an even number, East continued the suit. Now declarer simply won and drove out the spade ace to establish two discards for dummy’s club losers.


A convention invented simultaneously by Robert Jordan and Alan Truscott 50 years ago allows responder to show a limit range (after a major suit has been doubled) by jumping to two no-trump. Jump support shows, instead, a pre-emptive raise. It is easy to extend this principle to use it after a minor has been doubled. With a balanced hand you can start by redoubling.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 7 6 2
 K J 7
 K Q 10 6
♣ J 8 7
South West North East
1 Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, January 26th, 2012

There is no calamity greater than lavish desires.
There is no greater guilt than discontentment.
And there is no greater disaster than greed.

Lao-tzu


South North
Neither ♠ Q 8 3 2
 A 8 7 6
 A 9
♣ A J 9
West East
♠ J 7
 K 2
 10 8 7 6 5 4 2
♣ 7 4
♠ 10 9 6 4
 J 10 5 4
 Q 3
♣ 10 8 3
South
♠ A K 5
 Q 9 3
 K J
♣ K Q 6 5 2
South West North East
1♣ Pass 1 Pass
2 NT Pass 3♠ Pass
3 NT Pass 6 NT All pass

6

In today's deal, from the 2010 Gold Coast event in Australia, a straightforward auction would be the one shown here. With five hearts East would check back for a 4-4 spade fit by using checkback so his actual auction should show only four hearts.

In six no-trump on a passive diamond lead, declarer wins and must develop one extra trick from the majors. Best is to go after hearts first, to take advantage of the chances in both majors.

At one table Anton Blagov went after hearts by leading low from dummy, and when East played low without discomfort, judged that she could not have the king, so he inserted the nine successfully. However, the normal play is to lead a heart to the queen, losing to the king.

Best for West is to return a diamond now. Declarer cashes the heart ace himself (the Vienna Coup), then runs the clubs. In the four-card ending, declarer has the heart nine and three spades left, and dummy has its four spades. What can East keep? Answer: nothing works. What you mustn’t do as declarer is test spades early. If you run the spades before the hearts, you will disrupt your own communications.

Bulletin editor David Stern noted that his mother, Gerda, brought home the slam, but 80 or so declarers went down in six no-trump by playing spades prematurely. An alternative and unsuccessful approach here would have been to endplay East with a spade to lead hearts, but the recommended approach is a better percentage play.


Facing a balanced 22-24, you have just enough to explore for game. Best is to bid three clubs, using this call as Stayman just as it would be if your partner had opened two no-trump. Equally, if you play transfers over the opening two-no-trump call, you would be able to show a five-card major if you had one.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 10 9 6 4
 J 10 5 4
 Q 3
♣ 10 8 3
South West North East
2♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, January 25th, 2012

The dust of exploded beliefs may make a fine sunset.

Geoffrey Madan


South North
North-South ♠ A 8
 K Q 8 2
 Q 9
♣ K Q 10 5 3
West East
♠ K J
 A 5
 A 10 8
♣ J 9 7 6 4 2
♠ Q 10 7 5
 J 10 9 6
 J 7 5 4 2
♣ —
South
♠ 9 6 4 3 2
 7 4 3
 K 6 3
♣ A 8
South West North East
Pass 1♣ 1 NT Pass
2♣ Dbl. Rdbl. All pass

♣2

All this week's deals come from last year's Gold Coast tournament in Australia. This year's event is taking place this week, and you can follow the later stages on bridgebase.com.

Today’s deal comes from the finals of the teams, where in one room the contract was three no-trump declared by North. East led the heart jack, West ducked, and declarer won and led a club to the ace, after which eight tricks were the limit. Had declarer played the spade ace and another spade at trick two, the defenders would have been somewhat awkwardly placed, but West can avoid an endplay by shifting to the club nine eventually.

In the other room Ishmael Del’Monte judged well to use Stayman rather than transferring to spades. West’s double was less well judged and both North and South made him pay.

West led a low trump against two clubs redoubled, and Del’Monte won cheaply in hand, led a heart to the king, passed the diamond queen, ducked all round, and now ducked a heart to West’s bare ace. Back came a low club to the ace, and Del’Monte led a spade upon which West correctly unblocked his king to let East win the spade queen at the next trick.

However, when East mistakenly exited with a heart, West had to ruff and could do no better than exit with the diamond ace and another diamond. That left Del’Monte in hand for the trump coup. Nine tricks was worth a cool 1160 — a number you don’t see every day.


This is a close call. Do you repeat a bad six-card suit or pass? Because of the looseness of the club opening in Standard American, I would vote for rebidding clubs, allowing partner to join in if (as will inevitably happen) the opponents compete to the two-level.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K J
 A 5
 A 10 8
♣ J 9 7 6 4 2
South West North East
1♣ 1 1 1♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

In theory it is easy to convince an ignorant person: in actual life, men not only object to offer themselves to be convinced, but hate the man who has convinced them.

Epictetus


West North
Neither ♠ A J 7
 K 9 7 3
 Q 10
♣ J 5 3 2
West East
♠ 8 2
 J 10 6 4
 9 7 4
♣ A K 9 8
♠ 10 5 3
 A Q 5
 A J 6 5 3
♣ 10 7
South
♠ K Q 9 6 4
 8 2
 K 8 2
♣ Q 6 4
South West North East
Pass Pass 1
1♠ Dbl. 2 Pass
2♠ All pass    

♠8

Today's deal, from the teams qualifier at the Gold Coast in Australia last year, was provided by Michael Courtney. He thought that the right play, while obvious, might easily be missed at the table. Let's see whether you agree. To make matters a little harder for you, I won't tell you who has the tough play.

As West you decide not to lead a top club against two spades. Partner can hardly be ruffing, and even if he were, the trick may come back. Instead you lead a trump. This goes to the 10 and king, and declarer leads a diamond to the queen and ace. Back comes the club 10. You win, and …

At this moment you should pause to count. Your only practical chance to set the hand is to take three club tricks and one diamond, thus two tricks in the majors. Declarer cannot have six trumps or he would not risk the club ruff, so the full deal is surely very like the actual hand. You must shift to a heart to let partner win and go back to clubs so you can give him the ruff. If you take the ruff at once you never score the second heart trick.

Well done, Alex Czapnik for making the play. Was the play found often? Apparently not. The contract of two spades was declared about 100 times in all.

It was defeated 36 times and made eight or more tricks on 64 occasions.


Despite your good support for the minors, it is more practical to rebid two no-trump and limit your hand while getting across your good spade stop. You have not ruled out playing in either minor, but have let your partner know the basic nature of your hand. A raise to three clubs may stymie your partner if he has modest extras but no spade stop.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A J 7
 K 9 7 3
 Q 10
♣ J 5 3 2
South West North East
1 Pass
1 1♠ 2♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 23th, 2012

The way is all so very plain
That we may lose the way.

G.K. Chesterton


South North
East-West ♠ A
 A 10 7 2
 K Q J 10 6
♣ 9 7 2
West East
♠ Q 3 2
 —
 5 4 3 2
♣ A Q 8 6 4 3
♠ K J 9 5
 9 8 6 5 3
 9 7
♣ J 5
South
♠ 10 8 7 6 4
 K Q J 4
 A 8
♣ K 10
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2 Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
4♣ Pass 4 Pass
4 All pass    

5

When you end up in game, but when dummy comes down, wish you were in slam, it often happens that you get careless. Such was the case in this deal from the finals of the national pairs, played at the Gold Coast, where all this week's deals come from.

You might argue that all that was required was basic technique, and I would not disagree with you. But that proved surprisingly beyond many of the pairs here.

If North-South had an unopposed sequence here they might well have gotten to six hearts. On a black-suit lead you might be able to come to 12 tricks via six plain-suit winners, four trumps and two spade ruffs. But on a red-suit lead, you probably need the club finesse.

Let’s forget all that; you play four hearts on a diamond lead and count 10 top tricks. You win the diamond ace and cash the heart king … oops! What is the best way to recover? The answer is surprisingly simple: cross to the diamond king and run diamonds; when East ruffs in, you simply overruff and draw trump. That is 10 winners without relying on clubs at all.

So now are you ready to take the challenge: with the board played in four hearts 190 times, how many players went down? Would you believe one quarter of the declarers? I admit that from the North seat on a club lead you have more of a challenge, but still, this was probably not the field’s finest hour.


With the clubs and hearts appearing to behave decently for declarer, the question is whether to go for the surprise attack in spades or to lead your long suit, even though declarer has announced a stopper. Personally I'd vote for the diamond, but I can certainly see the case for the spade lead.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ K 8 3
 10 6
 A Q 8 6 3 2
♣ J 2
South West North East
Pass 1♣
2 2 Pass 2 NT
Pass 3 NT All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 22th, 2012

As a neophyte, I am frequently intrigued by the bidding. In a recent article, South opened one no-trump and North responded two hearts with long spades. Then South bid two spades with only two of them! Please explain.

Bidding What You Don't Have, Atlanta, Ga.

Mea culpa. I often forget that I should be explaining Jacoby transfers to my readers. (In my defense, I believe most players are now taught transfers in response to one no-trump, but not all my readers learned recently, and not all of them learn transfers.) Responses in a red suit to one no-trump are intended as a transfer to the suit above, showing five cards in that suit. Continuations are natural and are discussed here.

In fourth chair I opened two diamonds. My LHO doubled, and my RHO, who held ♠ A-J-3,  10-9-4,  K-3, ♣ Q-10-4-3-2, bid three clubs, claiming that this showed a good hand. I don't understand why it should not be very weak.

Disinformation, Casper, Wyo.

I'm not sure I agree with your RHO. He might have taken a shot at three no-trump himself, hoping to buy a diamond stop or be able to run the clubs. But perhaps he was playing that his call of two no-trump was the Lebensohl convention, acting as a transfer to three clubs. In that case a direct three-club call would indeed be constructive — but not forcing.

If I open one club or one diamond (playing five-card majors, thus opening the so-called better minor), do I have to have an honor in the suit?

Honor-Bound,Bellevue, Wash.

Absolutely not; open your longer minor, or one club with three cards in each minor. The closest I get to your rule is that with 4-4 in the minors I tend to open the better suit — but others have different rules to break that tie.

I heard a two-diamond pre-empt to my left and my partner bid two spades. What choices do I have with ♠ J,  Q-10-8-4-3,  K-10-5, ♣ K-J-9-4?

Lost in Spades, Charleston, S.C.

I think the lack of fit suggests bidding two no-trump now. Once in a while you might miss a game, but you make it a lot easier for your partner if he can describe his hand fully at his next turn.

Yesterday at our club West opened the bidding one heart and heard a two no-trump response, alerted as Jacoby. West, with a void in clubs now bid two clubs. The director was called, ruled that the insufficient call was conventional, and that East must now pass any sufficient call made by West. West now bid and made six hearts. Has the law been changed, or was this ruling correct?

No Justice, No Peace, Houston, Texas

Over the Jacoby bid, West clearly had a bidding box accident and so should be allowed to change his bid to three clubs. Had he really intended to bid two clubs, then if the next hand did not condone the call, the TD's ruling would be correct. However, the "insufficient" law has recently been changed. If the insufficient call did not convey additional information, then even if it were conventional, it might be permitted. The laws are not easy to enforce here.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, January 21th, 2012

When I consider life, 'tis all a cheat,
Yet fooled by hope, men favour the deceit….

John Dryden


West North
Both ♠ J 6 2
 A Q 10
 K 10 8 5
♣ A K 4
West East
♠ 10 8 4
 9 7 6 3
 A J 2
♣ 7 6 5
♠ K Q
 K 4
 9 7 3
♣ Q J 9 8 3 2
South
♠ A 9 7 5 3
 J 8 5 2
 Q 6 4
♣ 10
South West North East
Pass 1 2♣
2♠ Pass 2 NT* Pass
3 Pass 4♠ All pass

*Forcing

♣5

With no real fit, you do not have to bid combined 24-counts to game. However, as you look at all four hands today, four spades seems simple enough to bring home. You would be worried about losing a trick in each red suit and two trump tricks, but with the spades lying in such friendly fashion, you would expect the contract to make, as indeed it did at almost all of the tables where it was attempted — but not when Portugal faced Ireland's Adam Mesbur and Nick Fitzgibbon in the 2002 European Championships. The defense that the Irish pair found was both imaginative and effective.

North-South were playing a weak no-trump, which partly explains South’s aggressive initial action and North’s ability to rebid a forcing two no-trump. In response to his partner’s intervention, Adam Mesbur led the club five, which was taken in dummy with the ace. A low spade went to the king and ace, and this was followed by a finesse of the heart 10, which held. Next came a low diamond to the queen, also ducked without a flicker from Adam.

Declarer now confidently finessed again in hearts, and on winning with his now-bare king, Nick Fitzgibbon returned a diamond to Adam’s ace, who promptly played a heart, which his partner ruffed with the spade queen. That was the defense’s third trick, and with the spade 10-8 sitting over South’s nine, a further trump trick was guaranteed.


In response to a reverse it is relatively common these days to treat a rebid of your long suit (here, two spades) as forcing for one round. Almost all other actions deny five cards in the suit in which you responded. Whether or not you have this special agreement, there is no reason not to bid two spades. If you play the call as nonforcing and partner passes, you won't have missed game.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 9 7 5 3
 J 8 5 2
 Q 6 4
♣ 10
South West North East
1♣ Pass
1♠ Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].