Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, February 27th, 2012

A place for everything, and everything in its place.

Samuel Smiles


South North
Neither ♠ 7 5 2
 J 4
 A K Q 6 5
♣ K 9 5
West East
♠ A Q 10 6 4
 Q 6 3 2
 9
♣ 10 8 6
♠ —
 A 10 9 8
 J 8 7 3 2
♣ Q 7 3 2
South
♠ K J 9 8 3
 K 7 5
 10 4
♣ A J 4
South West North East
1 NT* 2♣** 3 NT All pass

*12-14

**Majors

♠6

These days it is considered normal to open a no-trump with a five-card major, so long as your hand is balanced and falls in the appropriate range.

Even hands with a five-card minor and a four-card heart suit, or with five clubs and four diamonds may be appropriate for a strong no-trump, so long as the hand is at the minimum end of the range and has an honor in each of your doubletons. If not, some other treatment of the hand is probably more appropriate.

When you open one no-trump, you often lose your 5-3 major fits; but as today’s deal indicates, that may be no bad thing! Witness what happened to the majority today, who were playing strong no-trumps. They located the 5-3 spade fit and played four spades, often doubled and down at least a trick.

Sartaj Hans of Australia was the only South player to make a game here; he played three no-trump after West had shown up with the majors. He was treated to a low spade lead and exploited dummy’s assets to the full by putting in the seven, holding the trick. With the knowledge of unfriendly splits around the place, he then made the expert’s safety play of leading a low diamond from the board at once toward his 10, trying to guarantee four diamond tricks for his side.

Whether East went in with his jack to shift to a heart or ducked, that was a sure nine tricks for declarer.


Your partner's double is Lightner – asking for an unusual lead, here typically dummy's first bid suit unless you have a holding in a side-suit that suggests he has a void there. In this case you do not need to look further than a low club for your lead; perhaps partner has a void and a cashing ace.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 8 7 4
 10 6
 K 9 8 3
♣ J 9 6 5
South West North East
1
Pass 2♣ Pass 2
Pass 4 Pass 6
Pass Pass Dbl. All pass

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 26th, 2012

I have a question about opening strategy. Recently we won a recent team-of-four league match, and this hand was pivotal. I was dealt ♠ A-8,  K-J-9-8-3-2,  9-2, ♣ 8-7-3. I chose to bid two hearts (which got us to an easy game, while our teammates stole the board in spades). What do you advise on opening either vulnerable or not?

Get Up and Go, Lorain, Ohio

I would advocate opening this hand at any vulnerability. I like my weak-two suits nonvulnerable to hold two of the top four cards — this suit qualifies because with the spade ace, my playing strength is as expected. I'd consider it a dead minimum at unfavorable vulnerability, but I'd still do it.

Is there anything to be said for balancing over a strong no-trump with a five-card major, even in a relatively flat hand? Would vulnerability (or your status as a passed hand) affect the odds?

Balancing Act, Worcester, Mass.

It is MUCH safer to balance over a strong no-trump than a weak no-trump. Partner won't take you so seriously and look for gold by inviting game. Equally, if nonvulnerable, you do not run the risk of going for 200. I'm most aggressive when both sides are nonvulnerable, far more cautious when both sides are vulnerable. I would not advocate balancing with a five-carder in a balanced hand, but two-suiters or the like should try to balance. This is especially so as a passed hand, where partner won't expect too much.

Where does the modern expert community stand on the double of four of a major – as an opening or an overcall: penalties, optional or takeout?

Red Flag, Dodge City, Kan.

I think most people treat a double of four hearts as primarily closer to takeout than penalties. In response to that double, with four spades one tends to bid the suit, or with extra shape in a two- or three-suited hand, one strains to act. The position is less clear facing a double of four spades. The double might be described as optional, meaning responder acts if he believes they can make what they bid. A balanced weak hand rates to pass and hope.

At rubber bridge I held ♠ A-9,  Q-10-7,  K-J-2, ♣ A-5-4-3-2 and responded two clubs to one spade. Over my partner's two-heart rebid I tried two no-trump, forcing, and now my partner bid three diamonds. What should I have done now?

Lucy Locket, Lakeland, Fla.

Your partner has suggested length (possibly only three cards) in diamonds. In context your side might make slam in a major. I'd start by giving preference to three spades, and if my partner bids three no-trump, I might advance with a four-club bid. I wouldn't be surprised if six hearts was best, though.

I have been "drafted" to teach a course in basic bridge at my senior citizen center, all because I opened my big mouth and mentioned that I used to play duplicate bridge in Manhattan. I was only (and still am) a mediocre player. Could you please recommend a book that would be suitable for my future students?

Student Teacher, Manhattan, N.Y.

"Five Weeks to Winning Bridge" by Sheinwold is a great book to learn from, but the Audrey Grant series of teaching books is far and away the best educational tool. Contact ACBL and they will help with details.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, February 25th, 2012

Today we walk by love;
To strive is not enough,
Save against greed and ignorance and might.

Bliss Carman


South North
Neither ♠ A K 3
 K 9
 J 6 3
♣ 10 8 7 6 2
West East
♠ Q 10 9 5 4
 4
 10 5 2
♣ A K 4 3
♠ 8 7 6
 A J 10 6
 K 9 8
♣ J 9 5
South
♠ J 2
 Q 8 7 5 3 2
 A Q 7 4
♣ Q
South West North East
1 1♠ Dbl. 2♠
Pass Pass Dbl. Pass
3 Pass 3 All pass

♣K

At matchpoints or point-a-board teams, scoring every trick counts, and an overtrick can have the same impact as making a grand slam. This will explain the goings-on in today's deal, which comes from the Warren Buffett Cup, the bridge event played between Europe and the USA along the lines of golf's Ryder Cup.

Against three hearts, Norberto Bocchi led a top club and switched to a diamond to the eight and queen. Declarer, David Berkowitz, continued with ace and another diamond and East, Giorgio Duboin (the hero of the tale), was in. He switched to a spade, covered by the jack, queen and king.

All that was left for declarer was to draw trumps, so he ruffed a club and led a heart toward dummy’s king. Had East won this and played another spade, declarer would have won in dummy and made the no-cost safety play of running the heart nine, a play that Duboin knew would succeed.

Instead, Duboin ducked the heart king! Now declarer continued with the heart nine, covered by Duboin’s 10. South could have guaranteed his contract by playing the queen (losing at most two heart tricks to go with a diamond and a club), but it looked certain to him that West had started with ace-doubleton of trumps, in which case he would make an overtrick if he ducked. So he ducked the heart 10, and now Duboin had to come to two more trump tricks to beat the partscore.


The simplest unambiguous way to show a good spade raise is to cue-bid two hearts — a call that cannot be misconstrued since you did not overcall in hearts at your first turn. Maybe a call of two diamonds should be artificial as well, but why put partner under unnecessary pressure?

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A K 3
 K 9
 J 6 3
♣ 10 8 7 6 2
South West North East
1
Pass 1 1♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, February 24th, 2012

Since when was genius found respectable?

Elizabeth Barrett Browning


South North
North-South ♠ 6 4 3
 8 3
 A Q J 8 3 2
♣ Q 6
West East
♠ K Q 5
 K 9 7 5 4
 10 6
♣ J 9 2
♠ 10 7
 A 10 2
 7 5 4
♣ K 10 5 4 3
South
♠ A J 9 8 2
 Q J 6
 K 9
♣ A 8 7
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2 NT* Pass
4♠ All pass    

*At least invitational with spade support

10

English international Margaret Nygren found a play in today's pairs deal that deserved to generate more than a matchpoint top for her side.

Against four spades, reached after a conventional response by North to show spade support, Margaret’s diamond-10 lead looks ineffective, but it had the effect of starting to damage declarer’s communications.

The lead was won in dummy with the ace, declarer unblocking the king. The spade three went to the seven, nine and queen, and West continued with a second diamond, won by dummy’s queen.

Next came the spade four to the 10, jack — and five! Margaret appreciated that declarer still retained the trump two, with the early play marking her partner with a top club, or declarer would have pitched a heart loser from dummy on a club. Had she taken her spade king, the defenders would have had two hearts to cash for down one but declarer would have had an entry to dummy via the spade six, to access the diamonds.

South now changed tack and played a low club to dummy’s queen. East captured this with his king, then led a low heart to South’s queen and West’s king. Margaret now exited with her spade king, at which point, according to West, declarer nearly fell off her chair. Dummy was now well and truly dead, and with declarer having to play entirely from her own hand, she ended up with just seven tricks.

Nygren’s brilliant ducking play in trumps had exchanged one trump trick for three elsewhere.


Whenever you have a game-forcing hand and no clear direction to head in, your second call rates to be fourth suit forcing. Bid two hearts, planning to convert a two-no-trump call or a bid of three of a minor to three no-trump. But if partner shows extras, you may be in slam territory — and this way you may steer clear of three no-trump when partner has a singleton or void in hearts.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A J 9 8 2
 Q J 6
 K 9
♣ A 8 7
South West North East
1 Pass
1♠ Pass 2♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

New things are made familiar, and familiar things are made new.

Samuel Johnson


North North
East-West ♠ 7 3
 K 7 5
 A Q 6
♣ A K 8 7 2
West East
♠ 9 8 4
 Q J 10 6 3
 J 9 5
♣ J 9
♠ 6 5
 9 8 4 2
 K 8 7
♣ Q 10 5 4
South
♠ A K Q J 10 2
 A
 10 4 3 2
♣ 6 3
South West North East
1♣ Pass
2♠ Pass 2 NT Pass
3♠ Pass 4♣ Pass
6♠ All pass    

Q

Today's deal demonstrates that there is always something new under the sun. On the surface of it, your contract of six spades comes down to establishing clubs or finding the diamonds to lie moderately favorably — a combined chance of about 75 percent. Can you do better?

Against your slam West leads the heart queen to your ace. You draw trump, throwing the heart seven from dummy, and lead a club. If West plays the five or four, declarer would cover, giving up an early club trick to facilitate establishing the suit. He can win the club return and ruff a club, coming to 12 tricks unless clubs are 5-1, in which case he falls back on the diamond finesse.

However, when West produces the club nine, you call for dummy’s ace. After cashing the club king, you play the club two and, once East follows with the 10, throw a diamond from hand.

No matter what East does now, the contract is safe. You can ruff the club queen and then have two discards for your own diamonds. A heart return provides the extra entry to set up the clubs, while a diamond back surrenders the 12th trick immediately. If West had produced the club queen, the suit would have split 3-3 and therefore the heart king and a long club would have provided discards for your losing diamonds.


Bid one heart. There are both tactical and strategic reasons why one responds to opening bids in a minor here. First, despite your limited values, you cannot rule out game for your side if your partner has a strong hand with either clubs or hearts. Second, you respond to make life harder for your opponents to get their act together.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 6 5
 9 8 4 2
 K 8 7
♣ Q 10 5 4
South West North East
1♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012

Don’t quack like a duck, soar like an eagle.

Ken Blanchard


South North
Both ♠ 10 9 8
 A 9 5
 10 7 3
♣ A K 8 5
West East
♠ A 4
 J 10 8 6
 A J 6 2
♣ 10 6 3
♠ J 7 2
 7 3 2
 9 8 4
♣ Q J 9 2
South
♠ K Q 6 5 3
 K Q 4
 K Q 5
♣ 7 4
South West North East
1 NT Pass 3♣* Pass
3♠ Pass 4♠ All pass

*Asking for five-card majors

J

The timing for releasing the trump ace can be the key to the success or failure of a contract.

The final contract in both rooms was four spades. In one room, on the lead of the heart jack, declarer won in dummy, then ran the spade 10. Whether West takes the ace now or on the spade continuation does not matter. Declarer comes to his contract, losing just two diamonds and the trump ace.

In the other room Leonid Podgur also led the heart jack. Jeff Meckstroth won in hand, played a club to the ace, then a spade to the king, which Podgur ducked in tempo. The tempo was important, for had Meckstroth been given any reason for suspecting a holdup, he had two other lines available. The simple one would be to return to dummy and run the spade 10. Or he could have cashed dummy’s club king, ruffed a club low in hand, then played the heart queen followed by the ace. Now a trump from dummy to the queen and ace endplays West into either opening the diamonds or playing the fourth heart. East can ruff with the spade jack, but now a diamond goes away, and only one diamond trick is lost.

In fact, Meckstroth, believing the spade ace was with East, simply entered dummy with a club to play another spade to the queen and ace. Two trump and two diamond tricks saw the game off.


Diamonds rates to be your side's safest partscore, so it certainly does not look wrong to pass. However, this hand has just enough potential for game to stay in contention. I would correct to two spades, hoping partner might find another bid. The simple raise to three diamonds might also work out fine here.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 4
 J 10 8 6
 A J 6 2
♣ 10 6 3
South West North East
1♠ 2♣
Dbl. Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, February 21st, 2012

Even when the wished end's denied,
Yet while the busy means are plied,
They bring their own reward.

Robert Burns


West North
North-South ♠ A Q J 3
 3 2
 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2
West East
♠ K 9 6
 K Q J 6 5 4
 A J 6
♣ 7
♠ 8 4
 10 9 8 7
 4 3
♣ Q J 10 9 5
South
♠ 10 7 5 2
 A
 K Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 4 3
South West North East
1 Dbl. 3
3♠ Pass 4♠ All pass

K

Sometimes it takes a precise order of play to succeed in a contract, and in today's deal you need to have your wits about you in four spades.

West led the heart king to South’s ace. If the game is to make, there is only one card for declarer to play at trick two — the spade 10. Had a spade been played to the jack or queen instead, declarer would lack the transportation to repeat the finesse. When the 10 holds, South finesses again in spades, then cashes the spade ace.

While it would not be wrong to cash the club ace next, it becomes essential to play a diamond to the 10. (If instead a diamond is played to the king, West will withhold the ace, and as it is vital not only to set up diamonds but also to access them, South will lack the entries to do both.)

Since it would clearly do West no good to duck, West must win with the diamond jack and return a heart. As the diamond ace is still out, South cannot afford to use his last trump to ruff this. So South must discard a diamond.

The defense now has no winning options. West can try another heart, but declarer is able to ruff this in dummy, then overtake dummy’s second diamond. Whether West takes the ace on this round or the next, declarer still has a trump with which to access the established diamonds.


Facing a negative double, you might look no further than your four-card spade suit and bid one spade. That would undervalue your assets considerably. You should jump to two spades, which is invitational and not forcing, suggesting a shapely hand with some extras, which you have.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q J 3
 3 2
 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2
South West North East
1♣ 1 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, February 20th, 2012

You see, but you do not observe.

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


South North
Both ♠ J 6 5
 A 5
 K Q 6 5 3
♣ 6 3 2
West East
♠ Q 9 4
 K J 8 6 3
 4
♣ Q 10 5 4
♠ K 10 8 3
 Q 9 7 2
 J 10 8
♣ J 9
South
♠ A 7 2
 10 4
 A 9 7 2
♣ A K 8 7
South West North East
1 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

6

Intermediate cards, such as 10s and nines, are very welcome in many contracts. On other occasions they can be a hindrance; blocking the smooth running of a suit. Look at today's deal, for example. Against three no-trump West leads the heart six, East playing the queen. What is your plan?

The original declarer counted five diamond tricks and four outside top cards, thinking that the only possible problem was a 4-0 diamond break. He won the second heart and led the diamond three to his ace. Giving his partner a reassuring nod, he continued with a low diamond to dummy’s king. If the suit had broken 2-2, he would have survived this piece of carelessness. He could have cashed the diamond nine on the third round, then crossed to dummy’s diamond queen to score a fifth diamond trick. Unfortunately, West showed out on the second round, and there was no way for declarer to recover. Whether he led the nine or the seven to dummy’s queen on the next round, he would have to win the fourth round of diamonds in his hand. Four plus four did not equal nine, and he was one down.

Since the diamond nine and seven were potential blocking cards, they should have been played under dummy’s king and queen. This leaves the way clear to lead the diamond six on the fourth round, following with the two from the South hand. The lead remains in dummy, and nine tricks are readily available.


Declarer's jump to game rates to be based on a long diamond suit and a single or double heart-stop. There is no reason to panic here, looking to lead some other suit than the one you have bid. Hope that partner can produce a high heart and a diamond stopper, and simply lead a low heart. You might tempt me to lead a club if my suit were king-queen fourth, though.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ A 8 4
 Q 10 8 6 3
 2
♣ K 10 6 3
South West North East
1
1 Dbl. 2 3 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 19th, 2012

As dealer, not vulnerable, I held ♠ 8-4,  J,  A-K-Q-J-9-7-5-4-2, ♣ 7. How would you open this hand? What would you do if vulnerable?

Ready for Action, Locust Grove, Va.

Thanks for the question. I think I would simply open five diamonds — although three no-trump to show a solid minor is an option. However, a nine-card suit suggests pre-empting to the maximum. Bid first, apologize later, I say.

In a recent Bid With the Aces, partner opened one club and bid spades twice. Your comment is that your partner showed at least 5-5 in the black suits and a good hand. If he started with a 5-5 pattern, why wouldn't he open one spade instead of one club? Is it to conserve bidding space, or to make it easier for his partner to respond with a weak hand?

Best Foot Forward, Pottsville, Pa.

With 5-5 in the black suits, the question is why if ever you would open one spade, not one club, or vice versa. To start with, when opening a hand 5-6 in the black suits, a one-club call is almost mandatory. With five good clubs and five bad spades, you have discretion to go either way. (I can see a lot of sense in bidding one club here.) However, with five decent spades, especially in a good hand, I would open one spade almost all the time.

Say you are in third seat with ♠ 2,  A-J-6-4-3,  Q-9-4-2, ♣ 10-7-3. Your partner opens one spade, and the next hand overcalls one no-trump. What would you do now? Would you bid, pass, or make a negative double?

Scurrying, Wausau, Wis.

Before we start, let's clarify our terms. A double of one no-trump here is NOT negative, but is penalty — you are about a queen shor for that action, though it is far from unreasonable. If you bid a new suit, you are making a nonforcing call, denying the values to be able to double, so a two-heart call, while not risk free, is an entirely reasonable action.

The other day an expert gave me advice that I either misunderstood or misheard. What I thought he told me was it is prohibited for a player to double on more than two occasions if his partner had passed after the first two times? This doesn't sound right, but I was told this by someone who considers himself an authority.

Double Doubling, Spokane, Wash.

Free advice is worth what you pay for it. A third double is not only legal, but it makes plenty of sense — if your hand warrants it. The third double tends to be more high cards than takeout. Perhaps what your adviser meant is that such doubles tend not to be pure takeout. I'd expect your partner would have to decide whether to defend or bid, but he should know that his partner is likely to have about four quick tricks for the auction thus far, so he would not require a trump-stack to pass.

Say you are dealt ♠ K-J,  A-9-7-4-3,  9-6-2, ♣ Q-10-7 and respond one heart to your partner's one-club opening. What should you bid over his rebid of one spade? Surely you cannot rebid two hearts, and your trump support seems too weak for a raise of either black suit, while you can't bid no-trump without a diamond stopper.

All Exits Blocked, Newark, N.J.

There is nothing intrinsically wrong with a call of one no-trump. (Yes, the opponents might even take five diamond tricks but surely won't manage more than that.). In fact, I might select that action at pairs, but at teams it looks clear to bid two clubs, hoping that partner didn't rebid one spade with an absolutely balanced hand, when one no-trump would have been best. So a club contract rates to be safe enough.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, February 18th, 2012

What of a truth that is bounded by these mountains and is falsehood to the world that lives beyond?

Michel de Montaigne


West North
Both ♠ J 5 3
 J 10 7 6 4 3
 A K J 10
♣ —
West East
♠ Q 9 8 6
 A 9 8 2
 —
♣ Q 10 9 7 6
♠ K 10
 K 5
 Q 6 4 3
♣ J 8 5 4 2
South
♠ A 7 4 2
 Q
 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 3
South West North East
Pass 1 Pass
2 Pass 3 Pass
3 NT Pass 4 Pass
4♠ Pass 5 All pass

♣10

In today's deal from the NEC tournament held last year in Yokohama, both tables reached five diamonds, Justin Hackett on a club lead, Valio Kovachev on a spade lead. The key to the defense is that when East gets in with the heart king, he must return a trump to kill the crossruff. The Bulgarian East missed this and played back a spade, but Justin drew a round of trumps himself, prematurely, on winning the spade ace, and that was fatal. In the ending, after declarer had trumped two plain cards in dummy, East could ruff a winning heart high and return a second diamond to leave declarer with a losing spade at trick 13.

In the other room a spade lead forced declarer to rush to take his discards. After he gave up a heart to East, Tom Hanlon accurately played back a trump, but Hugh McGann erred by discarding a spade — he could surely have afforded a club. Now, when declarer ruffed two spades to dummy, he had set up his long spade and at trick 13 would be left with a winner, not a loser. So the declarer who should have succeeded went down, and the one who should have been defeated made his contract.

Most of the expert declarers in five diamonds brought home their game when East did not find the diamond shift. Paul Gosney of Australia was one of the few defenders who found the diamond shift at the critical moment to beat five diamonds by force.


It may look attractive to raise to two spades on this auction, but there is a real danger that you may be running into a spade stack. While East has indicated unsuitability for defense, West may still be lurking in the wings. I would pass here, and only bid two spades with the same hand plus an additional minor spade honor. Let partner compete to two spades if he wants to.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 7 4 2
 Q
 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 3
South West North East
1
Dbl. Rdbl. 1♠ 2
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].