March 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A place for everything, and everything in its place.
Samuel Smiles
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 7 5 2
♥ J 4
♦ A K Q 6 5
♣ K 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 6 4
♥ Q 6 3 2
♦ 9
♣ 10 8 6 |
♠ —
♥ A 10 9 8
♦ J 8 7 3 2
♣ Q 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K J 9 8 3
♥ K 7 5
♦ 10 4
♣ A J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT* |
2♣** |
3 NT |
All pass |
*12-14
**Majors
♠6
Your partner's double is Lightner – asking for an unusual lead, here typically dummy's first bid suit unless you have a holding in a side-suit that suggests he has a void there. In this case you do not need to look further than a low club for your lead; perhaps partner has a void and a cashing ace.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 4
♥ 10 6
♦ K 9 8 3
♣ J 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
6♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
March 11th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
I have a question about opening strategy. Recently we won a recent team-of-four league match, and this hand was pivotal. I was dealt ♠ A-8, ♥ K-J-9-8-3-2, ♦ 9-2, ♣ 8-7-3. I chose to bid two hearts (which got us to an easy game, while our teammates stole the board in spades). What do you advise on opening either vulnerable or not?
Get Up and Go, Lorain, Ohio
I would advocate opening this hand at any vulnerability. I like my weak-two suits nonvulnerable to hold two of the top four cards — this suit qualifies because with the spade ace, my playing strength is as expected. I'd consider it a dead minimum at unfavorable vulnerability, but I'd still do it.
Is there anything to be said for balancing over a strong no-trump with a five-card major, even in a relatively flat hand? Would vulnerability (or your status as a passed hand) affect the odds?
Balancing Act, Worcester, Mass.
It is MUCH safer to balance over a strong no-trump than a weak no-trump. Partner won't take you so seriously and look for gold by inviting game. Equally, if nonvulnerable, you do not run the risk of going for 200. I'm most aggressive when both sides are nonvulnerable, far more cautious when both sides are vulnerable. I would not advocate balancing with a five-carder in a balanced hand, but two-suiters or the like should try to balance. This is especially so as a passed hand, where partner won't expect too much.
Where does the modern expert community stand on the double of four of a major – as an opening or an overcall: penalties, optional or takeout?
Red Flag, Dodge City, Kan.
I think most people treat a double of four hearts as primarily closer to takeout than penalties. In response to that double, with four spades one tends to bid the suit, or with extra shape in a two- or three-suited hand, one strains to act. The position is less clear facing a double of four spades. The double might be described as optional, meaning responder acts if he believes they can make what they bid. A balanced weak hand rates to pass and hope.
|
At rubber bridge I held ♠ A-9, ♥ Q-10-7, ♦ K-J-2, ♣ A-5-4-3-2 and responded two clubs to one spade. Over my partner's two-heart rebid I tried two no-trump, forcing, and now my partner bid three diamonds. What should I have done now?
Lucy Locket, Lakeland, Fla.
Your partner has suggested length (possibly only three cards) in diamonds. In context your side might make slam in a major. I'd start by giving preference to three spades, and if my partner bids three no-trump, I might advance with a four-club bid. I wouldn't be surprised if six hearts was best, though.
I have been "drafted" to teach a course in basic bridge at my senior citizen center, all because I opened my big mouth and mentioned that I used to play duplicate bridge in Manhattan. I was only (and still am) a mediocre player. Could you please recommend a book that would be suitable for my future students?
Student Teacher, Manhattan, N.Y.
"Five Weeks to Winning Bridge" by Sheinwold is a great book to learn from, but the Audrey Grant series of teaching books is far and away the best educational tool. Contact ACBL and they will help with details.
|
March 10th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Today we walk by love; To strive is not enough, Save against greed and ignorance and might.
Bliss Carman
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A K 3
♥ K 9
♦ J 6 3
♣ 10 8 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 5 4
♥ 4
♦ 10 5 2
♣ A K 4 3 |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ A J 10 6
♦ K 9 8
♣ J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ J 2
♥ Q 8 7 5 3 2
♦ A Q 7 4
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Dbl. |
2♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3♦ |
Pass |
3♥ |
All pass |
♣K
The simplest unambiguous way to show a good spade raise is to cue-bid two hearts — a call that cannot be misconstrued since you did not overcall in hearts at your first turn. Maybe a call of two diamonds should be artificial as well, but why put partner under unnecessary pressure?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 3
♥ K 9
♦ J 6 3
♣ 10 8 7 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 9th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Since when was genius found respectable?
Elizabeth Barrett Browning
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 8 3
♦ A Q J 8 3 2
♣ Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 5
♥ K 9 7 5 4
♦ 10 6
♣ J 9 2 |
♠ 10 7
♥ A 10 2
♦ 7 5 4
♣ K 10 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 8 2
♥ Q J 6
♦ K 9
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*At least invitational with spade support
♦10
Whenever you have a game-forcing hand and no clear direction to head in, your second call rates to be fourth suit forcing. Bid two hearts, planning to convert a two-no-trump call or a bid of three of a minor to three no-trump. But if partner shows extras, you may be in slam territory — and this way you may steer clear of three no-trump when partner has a singleton or void in hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 8 2
♥ Q J 6
♦ K 9
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
New things are made familiar, and familiar things are made new.
Samuel Johnson
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 7 3
♥ K 7 5
♦ A Q 6
♣ A K 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 4
♥ Q J 10 6 3
♦ J 9 5
♣ J 9 |
♠ 6 5
♥ 9 8 4 2
♦ K 8 7
♣ Q 10 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 2
♥ A
♦ 10 4 3 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
Bid one heart. There are both tactical and strategic reasons why one responds to opening bids in a minor here. First, despite your limited values, you cannot rule out game for your side if your partner has a strong hand with either clubs or hearts. Second, you respond to make life harder for your opponents to get their act together.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5
♥ 9 8 4 2
♦ K 8 7
♣ Q 10 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 7th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, February 22nd, 2012
Don’t quack like a duck, soar like an eagle.
Ken Blanchard
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ A 9 5
♦ 10 7 3
♣ A K 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ J 10 8 6
♦ A J 6 2
♣ 10 6 3 |
♠ J 7 2
♥ 7 3 2
♦ 9 8 4
♣ Q J 9 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6 5 3
♥ K Q 4
♦ K Q 5
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♣* |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
*Asking for five-card majors
♥J
Diamonds rates to be your side's safest partscore, so it certainly does not look wrong to pass. However, this hand has just enough potential for game to stay in contention. I would correct to two spades, hoping partner might find another bid. The simple raise to three diamonds might also work out fine here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4
♥ J 10 8 6
♦ A J 6 2
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
2♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Even when the wished end's denied, Yet while the busy means are plied, They bring their own reward.
Robert Burns
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ A Q J 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 6
♥ K Q J 6 5 4
♦ A J 6
♣ 7 |
♠ 8 4
♥ 10 9 8 7
♦ 4 3
♣ Q J 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ 10 7 5 2
♥ A
♦ K Q 10 8 5 2
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♥ |
Dbl. |
3♥ |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♥K
Facing a negative double, you might look no further than your four-card spade suit and bid one spade. That would undervalue your assets considerably. You should jump to two spades, which is invitational and not forcing, suggesting a shapely hand with some extras, which you have.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 9 7
♣ A K 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
1♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
You see, but you do not observe.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 6 5
♥ A 5
♦ K Q 6 5 3
♣ 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K J 8 6 3
♦ 4
♣ Q 10 5 4 |
♠ K 10 8 3
♥ Q 9 7 2
♦ J 10 8
♣ J 9 |
| South |
♠ A 7 2
♥ 10 4
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ A K 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥6
Declarer's jump to game rates to be based on a long diamond suit and a single or double heart-stop. There is no reason to panic here, looking to lead some other suit than the one you have bid. Hope that partner can produce a high heart and a diamond stopper, and simply lead a low heart. You might tempt me to lead a club if my suit were king-queen fourth, though.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 4
♥ Q 10 8 6 3
♦ 2
♣ K 10 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| 1♥ |
Dbl. |
2♥ |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 4th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 19th, 2012
|
As dealer, not vulnerable, I held ♠ 8-4, ♥ J, ♦ A-K-Q-J-9-7-5-4-2, ♣ 7. How would you open this hand? What would you do if vulnerable?
Ready for Action, Locust Grove, Va.
Thanks for the question. I think I would simply open five diamonds — although three no-trump to show a solid minor is an option. However, a nine-card suit suggests pre-empting to the maximum. Bid first, apologize later, I say.
In a recent Bid With the Aces, partner opened one club and bid spades twice. Your comment is that your partner showed at least 5-5 in the black suits and a good hand. If he started with a 5-5 pattern, why wouldn't he open one spade instead of one club? Is it to conserve bidding space, or to make it easier for his partner to respond with a weak hand?
Best Foot Forward, Pottsville, Pa.
With 5-5 in the black suits, the question is why if ever you would open one spade, not one club, or vice versa. To start with, when opening a hand 5-6 in the black suits, a one-club call is almost mandatory. With five good clubs and five bad spades, you have discretion to go either way. (I can see a lot of sense in bidding one club here.) However, with five decent spades, especially in a good hand, I would open one spade almost all the time.
Say you are in third seat with ♠ 2, ♥ A-J-6-4-3, ♦ Q-9-4-2, ♣ 10-7-3. Your partner opens one spade, and the next hand overcalls one no-trump. What would you do now? Would you bid, pass, or make a negative double?
Scurrying, Wausau, Wis.
Before we start, let's clarify our terms. A double of one no-trump here is NOT negative, but is penalty — you are about a queen shor for that action, though it is far from unreasonable. If you bid a new suit, you are making a nonforcing call, denying the values to be able to double, so a two-heart call, while not risk free, is an entirely reasonable action.
|
The other day an expert gave me advice that I either misunderstood or misheard. What I thought he told me was it is prohibited for a player to double on more than two occasions if his partner had passed after the first two times? This doesn't sound right, but I was told this by someone who considers himself an authority.
Double Doubling, Spokane, Wash.
Free advice is worth what you pay for it. A third double is not only legal, but it makes plenty of sense — if your hand warrants it. The third double tends to be more high cards than takeout. Perhaps what your adviser meant is that such doubles tend not to be pure takeout. I'd expect your partner would have to decide whether to defend or bid, but he should know that his partner is likely to have about four quick tricks for the auction thus far, so he would not require a trump-stack to pass.
Say you are dealt ♠ K-J, ♥ A-9-7-4-3, ♦ 9-6-2, ♣ Q-10-7 and respond one heart to your partner's one-club opening. What should you bid over his rebid of one spade? Surely you cannot rebid two hearts, and your trump support seems too weak for a raise of either black suit, while you can't bid no-trump without a diamond stopper.
All Exits Blocked, Newark, N.J.
There is nothing intrinsically wrong with a call of one no-trump. (Yes, the opponents might even take five diamond tricks but surely won't manage more than that.). In fact, I might select that action at pairs, but at teams it looks clear to bid two clubs, hoping that partner didn't rebid one spade with an absolutely balanced hand, when one no-trump would have been best. So a club contract rates to be safe enough.
|
March 3rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
What of a truth that is bounded by these mountains and is falsehood to the world that lives beyond?
Michel de Montaigne
| West |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 5 3
♥ J 10 7 6 4 3
♦ A K J 10
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6
♥ A 9 8 2
♦ —
♣ Q 10 9 7 6 |
♠ K 10
♥ K 5
♦ Q 6 4 3
♣ J 8 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ Q
♦ 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 2♦ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♥ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
5♦ |
All pass |
♣10
It may look attractive to raise to two spades on this auction, but there is a real danger that you may be running into a spade stack. While East has indicated unsuitability for defense, West may still be lurking in the wings. I would pass here, and only bid two spades with the same hand plus an additional minor spade honor. Let partner compete to two spades if he wants to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ Q
♦ 9 8 7 5 2
♣ A K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1♠ |
2♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
These days it is considered normal to open a no-trump with a five-card major, so long as your hand is balanced and falls in the appropriate range.
Even hands with a five-card minor and a four-card heart suit, or with five clubs and four diamonds may be appropriate for a strong no-trump, so long as the hand is at the minimum end of the range and has an honor in each of your doubletons. If not, some other treatment of the hand is probably more appropriate.
When you open one no-trump, you often lose your 5-3 major fits; but as today’s deal indicates, that may be no bad thing! Witness what happened to the majority today, who were playing strong no-trumps. They located the 5-3 spade fit and played four spades, often doubled and down at least a trick.
Sartaj Hans of Australia was the only South player to make a game here; he played three no-trump after West had shown up with the majors. He was treated to a low spade lead and exploited dummy’s assets to the full by putting in the seven, holding the trick. With the knowledge of unfriendly splits around the place, he then made the expert’s safety play of leading a low diamond from the board at once toward his 10, trying to guarantee four diamond tricks for his side.
Whether East went in with his jack to shift to a heart or ducked, that was a sure nine tricks for declarer.