March 2nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
But if success I must never find, Then come misfortune, I bid thee welcome, I’ll meet thee with an undaunted mind.
Robert Burns
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 8 5 2
♥ 7 6
♦ 10 6 3
♣ K Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6
♥ Q 10 4 2
♦ A Q 5 2
♣ 9 8 2 |
♠ 10
♥ K J 8 5 3
♦ 9 8 7
♣ 10 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ J 9 7 4 3
♥ A 9
♦ K J 4
♣ A J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♥2
Some players might try to come to a perfect stop in three spades, but the practical call is to bid four spades at once, hoping to reach a sound game, or persuade the opponents to let it through. Since you have what passes for opening values and a good fit, bid four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 8 5 2
♥ 7 6
♦ 10 6 3
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 1st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The last thing one knows in constructing a work is what to put first.
Blaise Pascal
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 4 3
♥ K 5
♦ Q 10 3
♣ K Q 6 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ A 10 8 4
♦ K J 8 6 2
♣ 8 2 |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ 7 2
♦ A 9 7 5
♣ A 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 9
♥ Q J 9 6 3
♦ 4
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣8
This hand raises the issue of what your partner should expect from a two-level overcall. Any reader who has seen me criticize overcalls on five-card suits may be surprised when I say that an overcall here is perfectly OK — though I draw the line at a jump overcall. Any decent six-card suit tends to be acceptable, though I'd probably pass at unfavorable vulnerability.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3
♥ K 5
♦ Q 10 3
♣ K Q 6 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 29th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Whate'er he did was done with so much ease, In him alone, ’twas natural to please.
John Dryden
| East |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ 10 7
♦ A 3
♣ A K J 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 7
♥ K 5 2
♦ Q 10 9 4
♣ Q 4 2 |
♠ A K 9 4 3 2
♥ A J 3
♦ 7 2
♣ 9 6 |
| South |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 8 6 4
♦ K J 8 6 5
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♠ |
| 3♣* |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Hearts and Diamonds
♠Q
You cannot do less than bid three diamonds. Your partner has guaranteed four diamonds and a little more than a dead minimum, so he should hardly find a three-level contract taxing. If he has anything in reserve, he may well be able to make game, and by raising diamonds you make it harder for the opponents to compete to three clubs if your partner has shape but not high cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 8 6 4
♦ K J 8 6 5
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
2♣ |
2♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 28th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
And wisdom is a butterfly And not a gloomy bird of prey.
W.B. Yeats
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ Q J 8 7 4
♦ A J 8 6
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ 9 6 5
♦ 4 3 2
♣ K Q J 5 4 3 |
♠ K Q 10 9 5
♥ 3
♦ Q 10 9 7 5
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7 2
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K
♣ A 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣* |
3♣ |
3♠** |
Dbl. |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
5♣ |
Pass |
| 6♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong
**Hearts
♠8
Although you have a beautiful hand you have no reason to assume that your partner has anything at all — even four hearts — since he might have been forced to act with nothing. Having doubled already to show a good hand, you can raise to three hearts now, to show an even better one and rely on partner to bid game with as little as queen-fifth of hearts and a black king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 7 2
♥ A K 10 2
♦ K
♣ A 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2♦ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 27th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I only took the regular course … the different branches of Arithmetic — Ambition, Distraction, Uglification and Derision.
Lewis Carroll
| North |
North |
| Both |
♠ 4 3
♥ 9 7
♦ A J 8 7 5 4 3
♣ J 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 2
♥ 8
♦ Q 10 6
♣ 9 7 6 5 3 |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ Q J 5 4 3
♦ 9
♣ A Q 10 8 |
| South |
♠ K 10 6 5
♥ A K 10 6 2
♦ K 2
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
2♦ |
2♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣7
Your partner cannot have five spades or he would have acted already. So the choice is to lead your top club (hoping to hit the 'jack'pot), or to play for partner to come through with unexpected length in one of the red suits. Leading through dummy looks like a better chance to me. If so, there may well be a case for leading the heart jack rather than a small card, unorthodox as that might appear.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ J 5 2
♦ Q 9 7 4 2
♣ J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♦ |
| Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
February 26th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Say you hold ♠ 8-3-2, ♥ K-J-5, ♦ A-Q-9-7-3, ♣ J-7 and respond one diamond to your partner's one-club opening. When your partner rebids two clubs, would you pass, raise clubs, or show where your values lie by bidding two hearts?
Moving Story, Elkhart, Ind.
The danger with a two-heart call is that it is hard to know how to stay out of game after you make that bid. Your partner will assume you have a slightly better hand than you do (though the action is far from unreasonable). Since passing seems too pessimistic, I'd raise to three clubs and hope partner can explore for three no-trump with a nonminimum. On this action he'd show stoppers, not ask for them.
My partner and I play inverted minors. We have agreed that to raise clubs, responder needs five, but only four to raise diamonds. We handle diamonds this way because the odds of a three-card diamond opening seem to be quite low. Exactly what are the odds of opening with only three diamonds, and do you agree with our scheme of responses?
Fiddling in a Minor Key, San Francisco, Calif.
Yes, I agree with your approach. I believe there's a 95 percent likelihood that a one-diamond opening will show four or more cards. Additionally, since I have a natural and nonforcing response of two no-trump available, I can always make this call with a completely balanced hand with four-card support, trying to get to no-trump whenever each of us has a balanced hand.
At my duplicate club I'm never sure when to ask questions if at all. The two situations that concern me are when I know what my opponents are playing and my partner does not, and when I don't believe that the answer to the question will affect my call.
Grill-Master, Augusta, Ga.
|
You should always feel comfortable in asking questions when intending to bid, even if you think you know what is going on. Also, if your opponents' methods are unusual and you believe they should have been explained, you can clarify for your partner's benefit. (After all, you might be wrong about what the bids mean!) Don't ask till the auction is over if you do not intend to bid, whatever the explanation.
In a recent Aces column, your partner had opened one club and you responded one spade. The next hand overcalled three diamonds and your partner bid four diamonds. You now suggested that with ♠ Q-J-9-8-3, ♥ K-3-2, ♦ 10-6, ♣ K-10-7, you should use Keycard Blackwood. How can you use Keycard if you don't know whether the trump suit should be spades or clubs?
Unsuitable, Miami, Fla.
Four diamonds was a control bid agreeing spades. So spades are trump and four no-trump is Keycard for spades. I don't think your partner could ever set clubs via this four-diamond cuebid (though you yourself could suggest clubs at the six-level).
What are the rules about dummy acting during the hand to prevent an infraction? Are the rules the same for leads from the wrong hand and for revokes? What if nobody spots the infraction at the table?
Rules for Dummies, North Bay, Ontario
Dummy can point out to declarer which hand he is in and whether he won or lost the last trick. And he can check whether his partner has revoked. But he can't ask the opponents if they revoked in midhand. However, when an infraction has occurred and been agreed on, dummy may call the director. And at the end of the deal he can also call the director to establish if an infraction has occurred.
|
February 25th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
When the truth entails tremendous ruin, To speak dishonorably is pardonable.
Sophocles
| North |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ A K J 3
♦ 9 8 3
♣ 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 4
♥ 9 6 4
♦ A Q 4
♣ K 7 6 5 |
♠ 7 2
♥ 10 8 5
♦ K 10 7 6
♣ J 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ Q 7 2
♦ J 5 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣5
With everyone bidding, your partner is probably the player who has stretched to act, but you cannot afford not to invite game here. Cue-bid three diamonds to show a high-card limit raise or better, but don't hang your partner any higher. If he signs off in three hearts, accept his word for it and let him play there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ Q 7 2
♦ J 5 2
♣ A Q 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
2♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 24th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
But let us argue points in order, And reason the whole case carefully.
Edgar Lee Masters
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A 10 9 6
♥ A 8 7
♦ A 8 6 3 2
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ Q 10 6 3
♦ K J 9 4
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ K J 9 5 4
♦ Q 7
♣ J 9 |
| South |
♠ K Q 8 4
♥ 2
♦ 10 5
♣ A Q 7 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♣ |
Pass |
4♦ |
Pass |
| 4♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♠ |
Pass |
6♠ |
All pass |
♥3
If you are unwilling to pass, should you overcall, double, or bid one no-trump? The last option is unpalatable for more than one reason, and a two-level overcall in your weak diamond suit might have you banned from bridge. What's left is a canape one-spade overcall, or — my choice — a double. I'd be planning to convert a two-club response to two diamonds, pretending I have a little more than I do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9 6
♥ A 8 7
♦ A 8 6 3 2
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 23rd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
We spend our midday sweat, our midnight oil; We tire the night in thought, the day in toil.
Francis Quarles
| West |
North |
| North-South |
♠ 7 4 3
♥ Q J 8
♦ A 9 4
♣ A Q J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K J
♥ 5 3 2
♦ Q J 10 5
♣ 7 3 2 |
♠ 10 9 6 5
♥ 7
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ K 10 9 5 |
| South |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ A K 10 9 6 4
♦ K 6
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
With a maximum in the 12-14 range and a heart stop, a contract rates to play just as well with you as declarer, I would bid one no-trump now. Conceivably three no-trump might be better from your partner's hand, but you cannot afford to pass up the opportunity to bid no-trump at your first turn, or you may not get another chance.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4 3
♥ Q J 8
♦ A 9 4
♣ A Q J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♣ |
Pass |
1♦ |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Reflection, you may come tomorrow, Sit by the fireside with Sorrow.
Percy Bysshe Shelley
| North |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 10 8 6
♥ 10 5 2
♦ A 9 3
♣ A Q 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7
♥ K ? 6 4
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ 7 4 3 |
♠ 4 2
♥ ? 8 3
♦ 10 6 4 2
♣ J 10 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 5 3
♥ A Q 7
♦ K 5
♣ K 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
Pass |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♥ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦Q
Tempting as it might be to bid three no-trump, your hand was not worth a drive to game at your first turn and has not become so when partner's response promises no more than 5-6 points. You can describe your hand precisely by raising to two no-trump. This shows a balanced 18-19 count and lets partner tell you what he has.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 5 3
♥ A Q 7
♦ K 5
♣ K 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
My great friend Patrick Huang must be one of the strongest declarers never to have won a world team title. But today's deal from last year's NEC trophy in Yokohama shows that virtue is not always rewarded, and sometimes the best line of play can leave you with egg all over your face.
How would you play four spades on a heart lead? Huang followed a line that combined technical expertise with table presence. He won, advanced the spade jack, and went up with the ace when Louk Verhees (part of the Anglo-Dutch winning team) ducked smoothly. Now he stripped off the clubs and exited with a heart, confident that he would come home whenever the diamond queen was onside or he had an endplay. Alas, not tonight. With the diamond honors wrong, he had found the only lie of the cards where this approach would fail.
In the other room, after South had opened one no-trump and North transferred into spades, he jumped to three spades. That got him into a congruent position, and West here also led a heart. The difference was that when David Gold advanced the spade jack, Liu covered. That was the end of the story, with 10 tricks for declarer and a game-swing for his side.
Only five declarers out of 50 duplicated the unsuccessful line found by Huang. But if you switch the diamond queen and spade king, it looks like the only winning line, so it is really hard to criticize it unduly.