February 21st, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Toil, brothers, toil, till the work is done, Till the struggle is o’er, and the Charter won!
Thomas Cooper
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 6 2
♥ 9 5
♦ 9 8 4 2
♣ K Q 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 5
♥ A 10 8 7 3 2
♦ J 7 3
♣ 3 |
♠ K Q 8 4
♥ J 4
♦ Q 10 5
♣ 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7 3
♥ K Q 6
♦ A K 6
♣ A J 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥7
Since the jump to three diamonds is game-forcing, you cannot pass, much as you might like to. I think fewer problems will come from giving false-preference to three hearts than from raising diamonds. On this auction a doubleton heart is all your partner has a right to expect.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6 2
♥ 9 5
♦ 9 8 4 2
♣ K Q 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 20th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It's them as take advantage that get advantage i' this world.
George Eliot
| West |
North |
| East-West |
♠ Q 6
♥ A K J 9 6
♦ K 6 4
♣ A 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 5 2
♥ 8 7 5 2
♦ Q 3
♣ 10 6 3 |
♠ K 10 7 4 3
♥ Q 4
♦ 9 8 7
♣ K 9 5 |
| South |
♠ J 8
♥ 10 3
♦ A J 10 5 2
♣ Q J 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
To pass out your negative double, North rates either to be balanced without a four-card major or to have a club-diamond two-suiter. It might be right to lead a spade to try to cash winners before spade losers go on dummy's hearts, but that is a very long shot. It looks logical to choose between the minors, and my vote goes to clubs — which rates to do nothing for declarer he cannot do himself.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 2
♥ Q 10 8 5 2
♦ 7 4
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♣ |
3♦ |
| Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
February 19th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
Playing rubber bridge with an expert partner, I held ♠ 9-8-3-2, ♥ A-7-4, ♦ Q-9-7, ♣ A-Q-10. I responded one spade to one diamond, and when my partner jumped to three clubs, I gave preference to three diamonds. Now my partner bid three no-trump. What would you recommend next?
Great Expectations, Dover, Del.
Facing likely short spades in my partner's hand, I'd expect him to be 5-5 or 5-4 and 18-19 points. With no wasted values in spades, I have enough for a jump to five no-trump to get my partner to pick a slam — although, to be frank, I cannot immediately see when any slam but six diamonds should be in the picture.
I often have problems with 9-11 points and five hearts facing a one spade opening. As an unpassed hand I cannot bid two hearts, which would be forcing to game and overstate my values. But if I bid a forcing no-trump and my partner responds in a possible three-carder, how can I safely introduce hearts or show my values?
Tight Fit, Selma, Ala.
A solution exists over opener's two-club rebid but it requires some artificiality. Use responder's rebid of two diamonds to show various hands including those with values and five hearts, while his rebid of two hearts should show six. This was invented by Les Bart; details, including more complex versions that allow you to unwind the problems caused by the forcing no-trump, can be found here.
You hold ♠ Q-10 ♥ K-J-9, ♦ A-Q-7-4, ♦ A-Q-9-3, and open one club. When your partner responds one spade, I assume you would jump to two no-trump, and now your partner bids four hearts. What should you expect your partner to hold?
Space Cadet, Twin Falls, Idaho
This is a tricky one. With spades and hearts and slam interest you know partner would bid three hearts first, then make a slam-try if he found a fit. But is your partner making a self-agreeing splinter (I think not, without prior discussion), or showing a weak hand with both majors and asking you to pass or correct? That would be my best guess, but I do see the specter of disaster hovering over my shoulder as I extract the pass card from the box!
|
With both sides not vulnerable, the bidding started with one diamond in first seat by my RHO. Holding ♠ 3-2, ♥ A-K-9-7-6-5-4-2, ♦ A-J, ♣ 7, I bid four hearts. After five diamonds by my LHO, my partner bid five spades! With no real clue as to what was going on, I passed eventually, and we made six. (Partner had seven solid spades and three small doubletons.) Should I have bid on? Was five spades forcing?
Hot Spot, Marion, Iowa
I think some might play the five-spade bid as lead-directing with a heart fit, helping to plan the defense. But overall the natural interpretation seems better to me. While I would be reluctant to bid six spades, I might have risked a call of five no-trump. This covers all bases if in fact what your partner had was a concealed heart fit and a request for a spade lead.
Recently you ran an interesting play problem that featured declarer in five spades doubled, after he had responded one spade at his first turn after his partner had opened one diamond, doubled on his right. His hand was ♠ A-Q-9-7, ♥ 9-6-5, ♦ 2, ♣ 10-9-8-5-4. My question is whether South's bid of one spade should show at least five cards or whether it is best simply to ignore the double.
Double Trouble, Duke City, New Mexico
After a minor is doubled, any five-card major is good enough to bid, and any major of four cards where you are happy to be raised on three to an honor. A hand on the cusp would be declarer's hand, where he had four spades to the ace in a balanced hand and an eight count. He might opt for one no-trump.
|
February 18th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Man … plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven As make the angels weep.
William Shakespeare
| East |
North |
| North-South |
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ 7 6
♦ 8
♣ K J 8 6 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 9 3
♥ 3
♦ Q 9 5 2
♣ Q 10 2 |
♠ K 7 2
♥ 10 8 5 2
♦ K 10 7 4
♣ A 4 |
| South |
♠ 8
♥ A K Q J 9 4
♦ A J 6 3
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
| 1♥ |
1♠ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
3♣ |
Pass |
| 3♥ |
Pass |
4♥ |
All pass |
♦2
The best action here depends on vulnerability and style. If I am vulnerable, wild horses could not drag an opening out of me; but at favorable vulnerability if my partnership style was to pre-empt aggressively, I might pre-empt to three clubs. Passing is not wrong — it all depends on whether nonvulnerable pre-empts are designed more to obstruct the opponents than start a constructive dialogue.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5 4
♥ 7 6
♦ 8
♣ K J 8 6 5 3 |
February 17th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, February 3rd, 2012
Veil, if ill, thy soul's intent: Let me think it innocent!
Maria Gowen Brooks
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ A Q 7
♥ 4 2
♦ A Q 6 4
♣ J 9 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 3 2
♥ K 10 5
♦ 7 3
♣ 10 6 5 4 |
♠ 6
♥ J 9 8 7
♦ J 10 8 5 2
♣ Q 7 2 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 5 4
♥ A Q 6 3
♦ K 9
♣ A K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♣* |
Pass |
| 2♥ |
Pass |
2♠ |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5♠ |
Pass |
| 6♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing
♦7
Your partner's negative double suggests precisely four spades. With no heart stopper and no comfortable rebid (a call of two clubs strongly tends to suggest 5-4 in the minors), best is to bid one spade. Your partner should know that bidding a three-carder here is a live possibility. After all, a jump to two spades would suggest no more than 12-14, but a shapely hand with four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 7
♥ 4 2
♦ A Q 6 4
♣ J 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♦ |
1♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 16th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The soldier is … exact in sums, master of the art of tactics.
Walter Bagehot
| South |
North |
| Neither |
♠ A J 10
♥ 6 3 2
♦ K Q 7 5
♣ J 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4 3
♥ K Q 9 5
♦ 10 8 3
♣ K Q 3 |
♠ 8 7 6 5
♥ 8 7
♦ 9 6 2
♣ A 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 2
♥ A J 10 4
♦ A J 4
♣ 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♥Q
Facing a two-level overcall, which promises both a decent suit and about an opening bid in high-card strength, there is a lot to be said for simply blasting to three no-trump at once. However, the defenders might be able to run the hearts against you. The alternative approach is to cue-bid two diamonds and rebid two no-trump — but that probably will not help you find a heart stopper.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10
♥ 6 3 2
♦ K Q 7 5
♣ J 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1♦ |
2♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 15th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Worm, be with me. This is my hard time
Theodore Roethke
| South |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 6 5 4
♥ A 9 8 4
♦ K Q 8
♣ K 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 9 3 2
♥ —
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ 9 6 2 |
♠ 10
♥ J 10 7 6 5
♦ 10 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 8 7
♥ K Q 3 2
♦ A 7 6
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
2♠ |
2 NT* |
Pass |
| 3♣ |
Pass |
3♠ |
Pass |
| 4♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♣ |
Pass |
6♥ |
All pass |
*Transfer to three clubs
♠K
Even if you play weak-jump responses to opening bids in competition, this hand is far too strong for such an action. In fact your diamond fit and heart shortage suggest strongly that you should be considering bidding four spades at once, thus making your opponents' task of estimating where they belong as hard as possible.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 9 3 2
♥ —
♦ J 9 5 4
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1♦ |
1♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 14th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Nothing needs a Trick but a Trick; Sincerity loathes one.
William Penn
| South |
North |
| North-South |
♠ K 7 4
♥ 5 3
♦ A K J 9 2
♣ 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 5
♥ K J 8 2
♦ 7 4
♣ K Q J 8 |
♠ 6
♥ A 9 7 4
♦ Q 8 6 3
♣ 9 7 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9 8 3 2
♥ Q 10 6
♦ 10 5
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Pass |
2♦ |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♠ |
All pass |
♣K
Your hand has real slam potential (imagine the facing hand with six good spades and the diamond queen plus the two other aces). Alas, since a bid of four diamonds would be natural, not a cue-bid, you must bid four hearts now. In such a space-constrained auction, this simply shows a good spade raise, neither promising nor denying a heart control. Second choice: a pessimistic raise to four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 4
♥ 5 3
♦ A K J 9 2
♣ 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3♥ |
3♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 13th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
And now the matchless deed's achieved, Determined, dared, and done.
Christopher Smart
| South |
North |
| East-West |
♠ K Q 6
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ A 6 5 3 2
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ J 10 9 4
♦ K Q J
♣ K Q J 6 5 |
♠ J 10 8
♥ 5 3
♦ 10 9 8 4
♣ 10 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 7 5 4 3
♥ K 8 7
♦ 7
♣ A 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1♠ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| 2♠ |
Pass |
4♣ |
Pass |
| 4♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6♥* |
Pass |
7♠ |
All pass |
*Showing the heart king
♣K
On this auction, dummy will put down four spades while declarer will have four hearts. Since both minor suits are extremely unattractive to lead from, I suggest you might as well lead from your five-card suit. Since you have the balance of high cards on defense, it might work out well to lead a deceptive spade two.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 4 2
♥ J 5 4
♦ Q 3
♣ A 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
2♣ |
Pass |
2♥ |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
February 12th, 2012 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 29th, 2012
|
Recently I had a ruling against us which I did not understand. My expert professional LHO overcalled one no-trump over my one-spade opening. My partner jumped to four spades, and after a long pause my RHO passed. When it came back to my LHO, he bid five clubs and found it to be a good save. Is this legal?
Hot Under the Collar, Ketchikan, Alaska
After a break in tempo, as here, the way the director should consider if the pause pointed to taking the action selected by the player. If it did, was the selected action an automatic one or was there a logical alternative? If the answer to the first question is yes, then the director would adjust the score unless there was no logical alternative to the successful action. I'm guessing the director determined that a slow pass of four spades did not imply that the sacrifice would be successful.
I held ♠ K-10-9-4, ♥ K-10-5-3, ♦ 10-4-2, ♣ A-Q and was faced with the problem of whether to open in third seat and if so whether to open a major or a minor. What do you advise?
Lost Leader, Pleasanton, Calif.
In any seat but third seat I would open one diamond. In third chair my diamonds look too weak for me toopen one diamond. With a good four-card major I might select that instead –but I do not have one! I'll live with the one-diamond opening and hope my LHO does not overcall one no-trump.
In my bridge club we play the short club or diamond. If my partner bids one club or one diamond, can I pass, or must I bid the next step up?
Moving On, Great Falls, Mont.
I assume what you mean is that playing five-card majors, you can open either minor on a three-card suit, not a two-carder. If so, these opening bids are nonforcing, but you may dredge up a response with a shortage in the suit opened. With a four-count and a five-card major but a singleton in partner's suit, I would indeed respond. I'd tend to pass one diamond more often than one club, since the former call does tend to deliver a real suit most of the time.
|
How would you raise your partner when the auction proceeds around the table one diamond – one spade – two clubs, to you, holding ♠ Q-10-3, ♥ K-10-3, ♦ K-10-5-3, ♣ K-10-4? At the table I thought that a gentle cue-bid of two diamonds would suffice, since both opponents were bidding strongly. But it turned out that we missed a game.
Undercooked, Lorain, Ohio
You have not provided me with the responding hand, but I'd say you did just fine here. As a general rule the higher cue-bid (especially if it takes the auction up a level, as here) shows at least an opening bid. Your choice of the lower cue-bid suggested a sound raise to the two-level, and it is not clear that you have any more than that.
Last week I held one of the strongest hands I ever held. My RHO opened two diamonds and I was looking at ♠ A-K-10-8-7-5-3, ♥ A-K-Q-J-4, ♦ —, ♣ Q. Should I double and then bid spades, ignoring the hearts, should I jump in spades, or is there a better approach? As the cards lie, partner has both minor-suit aces and a spade void, but seven hearts is cold.
Upward Bound, Harrisburg, Pa.
Cue-bidding to show a two-suiter with the majors seems a good way to start. The cue-bid (or even a call of four diamonds, showing the majors and a better hand) to be followed with five spades to show a hand with longer spades than hearts and 11 tricks in your own hand, might let partner bid seven hearts. Incidentally, jumping in spades should be strong, while doubling, then bidding or jumping in spades, is even stronger. But you can't ignore the hearts here.
|
|
If you can focus on the problem in today's deal, you are halfway to solving the problem. As South, declarer in three no-trump, you win the heart lead and can count eight tricks only.
To establish your ninth winner, you need to set up a diamond trick, but you cannot simply lead out three rounds of diamonds or East will win and play back a second heart, letting West run that suit. So you need to keep East off play for the duration of the deal.
Having established a plan, you cash the club ace at trick two, playing the club five from dummy, then lead the club jack to the king to advance the diamond nine.
East must cover or you will let the nine run. Now you win the diamond ace, on which West should let the diamond seven go, and play the club 10 back to the queen in dummy in order to lead the diamond eight from the board. East can cover by putting up the queen, but you can win the king. What is West to do? If he plays low, declarer exits with a diamond and West must win his jack. But if he unblocks the jack, then declarer’s six will unexpectedly be high.
In summary, if declarer is to make his contract, he needs the diamonds to be 3-3 and West to win the defense’s diamond trick. So East can have no more than two of the defense’s four top diamonds.