Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

Toil, brothers, toil, till the work is done,
Till the struggle is o’er, and the Charter won!

Thomas Cooper


South North
Both ♠ 10 6 2
 9 5
 9 8 4 2
♣ K Q 9 5
West East
♠ J 9 5
 A 10 8 7 3 2
 J 7 3
♣ 3
♠ K Q 8 4
 J 4
 Q 10 5
♣ 8 6 4 2
South
♠ A 7 3
 K Q 6
 A K 6
♣ A J 10 7
South West North East
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

7

If you can focus on the problem in today's deal, you are halfway to solving the problem. As South, declarer in three no-trump, you win the heart lead and can count eight tricks only.

To establish your ninth winner, you need to set up a diamond trick, but you cannot simply lead out three rounds of diamonds or East will win and play back a second heart, letting West run that suit. So you need to keep East off play for the duration of the deal.

Having established a plan, you cash the club ace at trick two, playing the club five from dummy, then lead the club jack to the king to advance the diamond nine.

East must cover or you will let the nine run. Now you win the diamond ace, on which West should let the diamond seven go, and play the club 10 back to the queen in dummy in order to lead the diamond eight from the board. East can cover by putting up the queen, but you can win the king. What is West to do? If he plays low, declarer exits with a diamond and West must win his jack. But if he unblocks the jack, then declarer’s six will unexpectedly be high.

In summary, if declarer is to make his contract, he needs the diamonds to be 3-3 and West to win the defense’s diamond trick. So East can have no more than two of the defense’s four top diamonds.


Since the jump to three diamonds is game-forcing, you cannot pass, much as you might like to. I think fewer problems will come from giving false-preference to three hearts than from raising diamonds. On this auction a doubleton heart is all your partner has a right to expect.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 10 6 2
 9 5
 9 8 4 2
♣ K Q 9 5
South West North East
1 Pass
1 NT Pass 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, February 6th, 2012

It's them as take advantage that get advantage i' this world.

George Eliot


West North
East-West ♠ Q 6
 A K J 9 6
 K 6 4
♣ A 7 2
West East
♠ A 9 5 2
 8 7 5 2
 Q 3
♣ 10 6 3
♠ K 10 7 4 3
 Q 4
 9 8 7
♣ K 9 5
South
♠ J 8
 10 3
 A J 10 5 2
♣ Q J 8 4
South West North East
Pass 1 Pass
1 NT Pass 2 NT Pass
3 NT All pass    

♠2

Sitting South, plan the play in three no-trump. West leads the spade two and East plays the 10!

Having been favored by a friendly defense at trick one, don’t waste it. This hand is about combining your chances. You could play for nine tricks by simply taking the diamond finesse or the heart finesse, but whichever you do, you are consigning your fate to a play that is no better than a 50 percent shot. Clearly taking the diamond finesse by leading the king, then low to the jack, is the best finesse to take (since a 5-1 heart break may prevent you from taking five tricks even when the finesse works, while running the diamond jack may not give you enough tricks against 4-1 diamonds). But can you do better?

First, try safely for five diamond tricks by cashing the diamond king and ace. Your chances of dropping the queen missing five are quite robust — in fact that will happen about 30 percent of the time. But if the diamond queen doesn’t drop, you should run the heart 10, hoping the queen is right and you can make five hearts. Your combined chances come to about two chances in three — quite an improvement on the simple finesse.

Finally, let’s revisit the defense. East erred by playing the spade 10 at trick one. If West had led from jack-fourth of spades, declarer would have had the doubleton ace and would surely have played the queen from dummy.


To pass out your negative double, North rates either to be balanced without a four-card major or to have a club-diamond two-suiter. It might be right to lead a spade to try to cash winners before spade losers go on dummy's hearts, but that is a very long shot. It looks logical to choose between the minors, and my vote goes to clubs — which rates to do nothing for declarer he cannot do himself.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ K J 2
 Q 10 8 5 2
 7 4
♣ K 8 4
South West North East
1♣ 3
Dbl. All pass    

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 5th, 2012

Playing rubber bridge with an expert partner, I held ♠ 9-8-3-2,  A-7-4,  Q-9-7, ♣ A-Q-10. I responded one spade to one diamond, and when my partner jumped to three clubs, I gave preference to three diamonds. Now my partner bid three no-trump. What would you recommend next?

Great Expectations, Dover, Del.

Facing likely short spades in my partner's hand, I'd expect him to be 5-5 or 5-4 and 18-19 points. With no wasted values in spades, I have enough for a jump to five no-trump to get my partner to pick a slam — although, to be frank, I cannot immediately see when any slam but six diamonds should be in the picture.

I often have problems with 9-11 points and five hearts facing a one spade opening. As an unpassed hand I cannot bid two hearts, which would be forcing to game and overstate my values. But if I bid a forcing no-trump and my partner responds in a possible three-carder, how can I safely introduce hearts or show my values?

Tight Fit, Selma, Ala.

A solution exists over opener's two-club rebid but it requires some artificiality. Use responder's rebid of two diamonds to show various hands including those with values and five hearts, while his rebid of two hearts should show six. This was invented by Les Bart; details, including more complex versions that allow you to unwind the problems caused by the forcing no-trump, can be found here.

You hold ♠ Q-10  K-J-9,  A-Q-7-4,  A-Q-9-3, and open one club. When your partner responds one spade, I assume you would jump to two no-trump, and now your partner bids four hearts. What should you expect your partner to hold?

Space Cadet, Twin Falls, Idaho

This is a tricky one. With spades and hearts and slam interest you know partner would bid three hearts first, then make a slam-try if he found a fit. But is your partner making a self-agreeing splinter (I think not, without prior discussion), or showing a weak hand with both majors and asking you to pass or correct? That would be my best guess, but I do see the specter of disaster hovering over my shoulder as I extract the pass card from the box!

With both sides not vulnerable, the bidding started with one diamond in first seat by my RHO. Holding ♠ 3-2,  A-K-9-7-6-5-4-2,  A-J, ♣ 7, I bid four hearts. After five diamonds by my LHO, my partner bid five spades! With no real clue as to what was going on, I passed eventually, and we made six. (Partner had seven solid spades and three small doubletons.) Should I have bid on? Was five spades forcing?

Hot Spot, Marion, Iowa

I think some might play the five-spade bid as lead-directing with a heart fit, helping to plan the defense. But overall the natural interpretation seems better to me. While I would be reluctant to bid six spades, I might have risked a call of five no-trump. This covers all bases if in fact what your partner had was a concealed heart fit and a request for a spade lead.

Recently you ran an interesting play problem that featured declarer in five spades doubled, after he had responded one spade at his first turn after his partner had opened one diamond, doubled on his right. His hand was ♠ A-Q-9-7,  9-6-5,  2, ♣ 10-9-8-5-4. My question is whether South's bid of one spade should show at least five cards or whether it is best simply to ignore the double.

Double Trouble, Duke City, New Mexico

After a minor is doubled, any five-card major is good enough to bid, and any major of four cards where you are happy to be raised on three to an honor. A hand on the cusp would be declarer's hand, where he had four spades to the ace in a balanced hand and an eight count. He might opt for one no-trump.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, February 4th, 2012

Man … plays such fantastic tricks before high heaven
As make the angels weep.

William Shakespeare


East North
North-South ♠ J 6 5 4
 7 6
 8
♣ K J 8 6 5 3
West East
♠ A Q 10 9 3
 3
 Q 9 5 2
♣ Q 10 2
♠ K 7 2
 10 8 5 2
 K 10 7 4
♣ A 4
South
♠ 8
 A K Q J 9 4
 A J 6 3
♣ 9 7
South West North East
Pass
1 1♠ Pass 2
2♠ Pass 3♣ Pass
3 Pass 4 All pass

2

In today's deal, Hall of Famer Tommy Sanders declared an optimistic contract of four hearts, after West had overcalled in spades and his partner had cue-bid to show a strong raise.

After an opening diamond lead, the obvious thing to do was to win the ace and ruff a diamond. But then there would be no quick entry to the South hand for the second diamond ruff, and the contract would fail even if South made a winning guess in clubs.

Sanders instead played low from dummy at trick one and ducked East’s diamond king. This neither gained nor lost a trick, but it created an illusion. West was now convinced that his partner held the diamond ace. East predictably shifted to a trump, and South won with the ace and ruffed a diamond. When he led a spade from the dummy, East could have saved his partner by putting up the king. When he played low and West won with the nine, West confidently led a diamond, and was discomfited to find that South could take two diamond tricks. Sanders then made the winning guess in clubs, since East was almost sure to have the club ace for his two-heart cue-bid.

Of course, West had assumed that if East had the diamond ace, South was bound to have the club ace and would be able to run the clubs if West continued passively with spades. However, if that were the position, South would have played on clubs not spades after ruffing the diamond.


The best action here depends on vulnerability and style. If I am vulnerable, wild horses could not drag an opening out of me; but at favorable vulnerability if my partnership style was to pre-empt aggressively, I might pre-empt to three clubs. Passing is not wrong — it all depends on whether nonvulnerable pre-empts are designed more to obstruct the opponents than start a constructive dialogue.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 6 5 4
 7 6
 8
♣ K J 8 6 5 3
South West North East
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, February 3rd, 2012

Veil, if ill, thy soul's intent:
Let me think it innocent!

Maria Gowen Brooks


South North
East-West ♠ A Q 7
 4 2
 A Q 6 4
♣ J 9 8 3
West East
♠ K 8 3 2
 K 10 5
 7 3
♣ 10 6 5 4
♠ 6
 J 9 8 7
 J 10 8 5 2
♣ Q 7 2
South
♠ J 10 9 5 4
 A Q 6 3
 K 9
♣ A K
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2♣* Pass
2 Pass 2♠ Pass
3♣ Pass 3 Pass
4 NT Pass 5♠ Pass
6♠ All pass    

*Game-forcing

7

Today's deal was reported by Ron Klinger of Australia, the innocent party defending from the West seat and a serious candidate for the best-played hand of the year. To test yourself (and see whether you too could be a world-beater!), cover up the East and West cards.

Where would you like to play the hand? The spade slam looks entirely playable since it has excellent chances if either of the major-suit finesses works. Is there anything that can be done if the kings do not cooperate? Let’s see!

Yoshiyuki Nakamura and Masayuki Nakamura were South and North respectively.

Nakamura reached slam, won the diamond lead in hand, passed the spade jack successfully, unblocked both top club honors, played a spade to the queen, and found that the 4-1 fit meant he had a virtually sure loser in that suit.

Rather than relying on the heart finesse, Nakamura postponed the decision. He ruffed a club, then took the diamond ace, spade ace, and club jack, and led the diamond queen. In the four-card ending, West was down to the spade king and the heart K-10-5. If he ruffed, he would have been endplayed to lead a heart into declarer’s tenace, so he discarded a heart, and South now ruffed his last diamond in hand. This time West had no choice but to overruff, or the heart ace would have been declarer’s 12th trick, but he finally had to concede the last two tricks to declarer’s A-Q of hearts.


Your partner's negative double suggests precisely four spades. With no heart stopper and no comfortable rebid (a call of two clubs strongly tends to suggest 5-4 in the minors), best is to bid one spade. Your partner should know that bidding a three-carder here is a live possibility. After all, a jump to two spades would suggest no more than 12-14, but a shapely hand with four spades.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A Q 7
 4 2
 A Q 6 4
♣ J 9 8 3
South West North East
1 1 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

The soldier is … exact in sums, master of the art of tactics.

Walter Bagehot


South North
Neither ♠ A J 10
 6 3 2
 K Q 7 5
♣ J 10 4
West East
♠ 9 4 3
 K Q 9 5
 10 8 3
♣ K Q 3
♠ 8 7 6 5
 8 7
 9 6 2
♣ A 9 6 5
South
♠ K Q 2
 A J 10 4
 A J 4
♣ 8 7 2
South West North East
1 NT Pass 3 NT All pass

Q

The play by fourth hand on any trick tends to be a case of winning when you can, and playing small when you can't. But there is scope for both the tactical and strategic duck in fourth chair.

By using these terms, I am trying to differentiate between a play calculated to increase your trick-taking potential within the suit (a tactical play) and one where no further tricks are gained from the suit (in fact, you may even sacrifice tricks), but you end up with more tricks overall than if you had not made the play.

Today’s deal is an example of a tactical duck — a variation on the Bath Coup. West leads a top heart (suggesting a king-queen holding without the jack) against three no-trump, and East’s discouraging seven may be hard for West to read. If you win the first trick and play on clubs, you might persuade West to win and continue hearts.

But you may feel you are better advised to duck the trick; however that is not enough. If you follow with the four, West will know his partner’s card was a small one, so he will switch, and you are unlikely to get a second heart trick without letting the defenders find the club shift.

Better might be to duck trick one and follow with the 10 from hand. West will now ‘know’ his partner has a high heart and surely will continue the suit. That will give you your ninth trick.


Facing a two-level overcall, which promises both a decent suit and about an opening bid in high-card strength, there is a lot to be said for simply blasting to three no-trump at once. However, the defenders might be able to run the hearts against you. The alternative approach is to cue-bid two diamonds and rebid two no-trump — but that probably will not help you find a heart stopper.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A J 10
 6 3 2
 K Q 7 5
♣ J 10 4
South West North East
1 2♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, February 1st, 2012

Worm, be with me.
This is my hard time

Theodore Roethke


South North
Both ♠ A 6 5 4
 A 9 8 4
 K Q 8
♣ K 10
West East
♠ K Q J 9 3 2
 —
 J 9 5 4
♣ 9 6 2
♠ 10
 J 10 7 6 5
 10 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 4
South
♠ 8 7
 K Q 3 2
 A 7 6
♣ A Q J 3
South West North East
1 NT 2♠ 2 NT* Pass
3♣ Pass 3♠ Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5♣ Pass 6 All pass

*Transfer to three clubs

♠K

What would you say declarer's chances of making 11 tricks are in today's deal? You appear to have a spade loser and maybe two trumps as well. If you fancy your chances, let's up the ante a little: you are playing six hearts, not five, and the defenders lead the spade king to your ace. You cash the heart king, finding the extremely bad news. Rather than give up, you decide to play on, cashing your side-suit winners, just to see what happens.

You try to take all four of your club winners, pitching spades from the board, and fortunately East has to follow suit to all of them. Next come the three top diamonds, and again both defenders follow suit dutifully. You have reduced to a four-card ending with three trumps and a losing spade in each hand.

Next comes the spade loser. West tries to win the trick, but to his disgust, East will have to ruff his partner’s winner. In the three-card ending East is reduced to the J-10-7 of hearts. Since a low heart play would be immediately fatal, East must exit with a top heart. Declarer wins in dummy and runs the heart nine, winning the last two tricks. Contract made!

Incidentally, the right trump to lead to the first trick is a high heart from South. Tghhat way you can pick up a singleton 10 or jack in either defender’s hand.


Even if you play weak-jump responses to opening bids in competition, this hand is far too strong for such an action. In fact your diamond fit and heart shortage suggest strongly that you should be considering bidding four spades at once, thus making your opponents' task of estimating where they belong as hard as possible.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q J 9 3 2
 —
 J 9 5 4
♣ 9 6 2
South West North East
1 1
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, January 31st, 2012

Nothing needs a Trick but a Trick; Sincerity loathes one.

William Penn


South North
North-South ♠ K 7 4
 5 3
 A K J 9 2
♣ 6 4 3
West East
♠ J 10 5
 K J 8 2
 7 4
♣ K Q J 8
♠ 6
 A 9 7 4
 Q 8 6 3
♣ 9 7 5 2
South
♠ A Q 9 8 3 2
 Q 10 6
 10 5
♣ A 10
South West North East
1♠ Pass 2 Pass
2♠ Pass 4♠ All pass

♣K

When dummy comes down in four spades on a top club lead, it is easy to see that there are now three established fast losers (two hearts and one club) and declarer has to find a way to dispose of his third-round heart loser.

The natural approach might be to win the club and duck a heart, but the defenders can prevail by continuing the attack on clubs. Now if South plays a second heart, East will win and play back a spade. If South takes the heart ruff in dummy he can only escape from the North hand by leading diamonds, promoting a trump trick for West.

An alternative approach of taking the diamond finesse also fails as the cards lie, since the defenders now have four top winners, while ruffing a diamond before drawing trump seems to establish a trump trick for West. So what’s left?

The winning line is straightforward enough, but hard to spot. South wins the club lead and cashes the spade ace. When both opponents follow, he takes the ace and king of diamonds, then leads the diamond jack, planning to pitch a club if East follows low. This line virtually insures the contract no matter who has the diamond queen. If East covers the diamond jack, South must ruff high, then cross to the spade king to lead a diamond winner and pitch the club loser. No matter what happens next, he can lose no more than two hearts and one trump.


Your hand has real slam potential (imagine the facing hand with six good spades and the diamond queen plus the two other aces). Alas, since a bid of four diamonds would be natural, not a cue-bid, you must bid four hearts now. In such a space-constrained auction, this simply shows a good spade raise, neither promising nor denying a heart control. Second choice: a pessimistic raise to four spades.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 7 4
 5 3
 A K J 9 2
♣ 6 4 3
South West North East
3 3♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, January 30th, 2012

And now the matchless deed's achieved,
Determined, dared, and done.

Christopher Smart


South North
East-West ♠ K Q 6
 A Q 6 2
 A 6 5 3 2
♣ 7
West East
♠ 2
 J 10 9 4
 K Q J
♣ K Q J 6 5
♠ J 10 8
 5 3
 10 9 8 4
♣ 10 9 8 3
South
♠ A 9 7 5 4 3
 K 8 7
 7
♣ A 4 2
South West North East
1♠ Dbl. Rdbl. Pass
2♠ Pass 4♣ Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 5 NT Pass
6* Pass 7♠ All pass

*Showing the heart king

♣K

Today's deal features a problem in both the bidding and the play. After West doubles one spade, North redoubles to show a good hand, South rebids two spades to show a minimum hand with six spades, and North can make a splinter raise to four clubs to show a singleton club and spade support. That lets South show his diamond control, and North follows up with Blackwood for aces, then with five no-trump for specific kings. When South shows the heart king, North takes a shot at the grand slam, taking the reasonable gamble that his side can take enough tricks from club ruffs in his hand, or that declarer can establish diamonds.

The lead of the club king goes to the ace. Next comes a club ruff, the spade king, the diamond ace, and a diamond ruff.

This is followed by the spade queen, a second diamond ruff, and the spade ace, while the heart two is thrown from dummy. A heart to the queen for a further diamond ruff is followed by the heart king, and dummy is high.

The advantage of following this line of play is that declarer gets to discover whether the diamonds are going to break before he has to discard from dummy on the third top spade. Had East discarded on the third diamond, then the play of the last trump from South’s hand would have squeezed West if he had begun with five diamonds and four hearts.


On this auction, dummy will put down four spades while declarer will have four hearts. Since both minor suits are extremely unattractive to lead from, I suggest you might as well lead from your five-card suit. Since you have the balance of high cards on defense, it might work out well to lead a deceptive spade two.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 9 6 4 2
 J 5 4
 Q 3
♣ A 8 3
South West North East
1 NT
Pass 2♣ Pass 2
Pass 3 NT All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, January 29th, 2012

Recently I had a ruling against us which I did not understand. My expert professional LHO overcalled one no-trump over my one-spade opening. My partner jumped to four spades, and after a long pause my RHO passed. When it came back to my LHO, he bid five clubs and found it to be a good save. Is this legal?

Hot Under the Collar, Ketchikan, Alaska

After a break in tempo, as here, the way the director should consider if the pause pointed to taking the action selected by the player. If it did, was the selected action an automatic one or was there a logical alternative? If the answer to the first question is yes, then the director would adjust the score unless there was no logical alternative to the successful action. I'm guessing the director determined that a slow pass of four spades did not imply that the sacrifice would be successful.

I held ♠ K-10-9-4,  K-10-5-3,  10-4-2, ♣ A-Q and was faced with the problem of whether to open in third seat and if so whether to open a major or a minor. What do you advise?

Lost Leader, Pleasanton, Calif.

In any seat but third seat I would open one diamond. In third chair my diamonds look too weak for me toopen one diamond. With a good four-card major I might select that instead –but I do not have one! I'll live with the one-diamond opening and hope my LHO does not overcall one no-trump.

In my bridge club we play the short club or diamond. If my partner bids one club or one diamond, can I pass, or must I bid the next step up?

Moving On, Great Falls, Mont.

I assume what you mean is that playing five-card majors, you can open either minor on a three-card suit, not a two-carder. If so, these opening bids are nonforcing, but you may dredge up a response with a shortage in the suit opened. With a four-count and a five-card major but a singleton in partner's suit, I would indeed respond. I'd tend to pass one diamond more often than one club, since the former call does tend to deliver a real suit most of the time.

How would you raise your partner when the auction proceeds around the table one diamond – one spade – two clubs, to you, holding ♠ Q-10-3,  K-10-3,  K-10-5-3, ♣ K-10-4? At the table I thought that a gentle cue-bid of two diamonds would suffice, since both opponents were bidding strongly. But it turned out that we missed a game.

Undercooked, Lorain, Ohio

You have not provided me with the responding hand, but I'd say you did just fine here. As a general rule the higher cue-bid (especially if it takes the auction up a level, as here) shows at least an opening bid. Your choice of the lower cue-bid suggested a sound raise to the two-level, and it is not clear that you have any more than that.

Last week I held one of the strongest hands I ever held. My RHO opened two diamonds and I was looking at ♠ A-K-10-8-7-5-3,  A-K-Q-J-4,  —, ♣ Q. Should I double and then bid spades, ignoring the hearts, should I jump in spades, or is there a better approach? As the cards lie, partner has both minor-suit aces and a spade void, but seven hearts is cold.

Upward Bound, Harrisburg, Pa.

Cue-bidding to show a two-suiter with the majors seems a good way to start. The cue-bid (or even a call of four diamonds, showing the majors and a better hand) to be followed with five spades to show a hand with longer spades than hearts and 11 tricks in your own hand, might let partner bid seven hearts. Incidentally, jumping in spades should be strong, while doubling, then bidding or jumping in spades, is even stronger. But you can't ignore the hearts here.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog. Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2012. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].